CDP is a global environmental impact non-profit helping investors, companies and cities assess their environmental impact and take urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy.
High quality, relevant information is the fundamental basis for action and we help investors, companies and cities to measure, understand and address their environmental impact. The world’s economy looks to CDP as the gold standard of environmental reporting with the richest and most comprehensive dataset on corporate and city action. We aim to make environmental reporting mainstream and provide the detailed insights and analysis to drive the urgent action needed for a climate safe, water secure, deforestation free world.
CDP offers a voluntary climate change reporting platform for city governments. The program provides the world’s first global platform for municipal governments to disclose greenhouse gas emissions, climate change risks, and mitigation and adaptation strategies. CDP collects and delivers materially relevant data for cities, the private sector, and other stakeholders.
Global cities stepping up on climate action showcases the action cities around the world are taking to transition to a sustainable, low carbon economy.
We invite a reply to the following questions. In 2019, CDP has partnered with ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability to present one unified platform for city climate reporting, streamlining the process of reporting and ensuing simplicity and standardisation for reporting cities. Cities will only have to report once, on one platform, to the following questions.
ICLEI will continue to support and provide technical assistance to local governments, while CDP and ICLEI will both use the self-reported city data to provide robust analysis of the action being taken by cities across the world.
Please respond to the information request using CDP’s Online Response System (ORS), accessed via CDP’s website or the activation link you will receive. This document shows all the possible questions that cities may encounter in the ORS. However, it should not be used instead of the ORS. If you are unable to respond online via the ORS please e-mail [email protected].
Please answer the questions comprehensively while also assessing the relevance of the information you provide. Where you do not have all of the information requested, please respond with what you have as this is more valuable than no response.
The deadline for response is 10th July 2019.
The Global Covenant of Mayors (GCoM) has developed a new Common Reporting Framework in consultation with partners and cities and local governments around the world. This framework includes a set of global recommendations to ensure robust climate action planning, implementation and monitoring, and streamline measurement and reporting procedures. Global Covenant of Mayors (GCoM) questions used to report using the new framework are integrated in the Cities questionnaire.
The GCoM reporting framework uses precise language to indicate which provisions are requirements and which are optional. The term “shall” is used throughout the guidance to indicate what is required. The mandatory GCoM Common Reporting Framework requirements are detailed using this terminology throughout this guidance document, under the “GCoM Guidance” sections.
Recommendations that GCoM cities are strongly advised to follow are introduced by the term “should”, and optional provisions are introduced by the term “may”.
For more detailed information on the reporting requirements, please refer to the GCoM Guidance note.
Through this initiative, WWF will assess the gap between your city's current emissions and the safe range (limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees) and also advise on high impact reduction actions. For this analysis, the Global Covenant of Mayors reporting requirements will be used, which are integrated throughout the questionnaire. For more information, please contact WWF directly on [email protected].
CDP would like to thank the following people and organizations for their assistance in developing the CDP Cities 2019 questionnaire and guidance documents:
Amy Jewel, Chicago, Illinois | Barbara Buffaloe, Columbia Missouri |
Catherine Heinzer, Basel | Felipe Cerbella Mandarino, Rio de Janeiro |
Georgios Neofytou, City of Athens | Glenys Verhulst, District of Saanich |
Jennifer Orr, City of Adelaide | Jenny Haining, Wollongong City |
Juma Haule, Dar es Salaam | Laurel Creech, Nashville |
Lauren Thead, Boynton Beach | Liam Henderson, Melbourne |
Lizanda van Rensburg, Cape Town | Lloyd Lee, City of Vancouver |
Lynn Coppedge, Lakewood, CO | Marta Papetti, Milano |
Morten Højer, Copenhagen | Jens Sperling, Copenhagen |
Muhammad Maswood Alam, Karachi | Nahuel Pugliese, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires |
Neda Kostandinovic, Barcelona | Rebecca Harvey, Boynton Beach |
Rich Freeh, Philadelphia | Ross MacWhinney, New York City |
Please complete the following table:
Administrative boundary | Description of city |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
Identify the administrative boundary of your city by selecting the most appropriate response from the following list of values:
You are also asked to give a description of your city. The information provided here will assist CDP in drawing upon distinctions, similarities, and comparative features between cities in terms of their community emissions as well as tools and successes in mitigating and adapting to climate change. Information that could be provided includes:
Please attach the relevant document here.
To join the Global Covenant of Mayors initiative, please visit the Global Covenant website and download the relevant Letter of Commitment template. Once the commitment letter is signed by an appropriately mandated official according to local government procedures, the city is asked to take action to transition to a low emission and climate resilient economy and regularly report on their progress.
Cities whose commitments have already been acknowledged by the Global Covenant do not need to reattach their letter. You can check the status of your commitment here.
Please complete the following table:
Leader title | Leader name | Current term end month | Current term end year |
---|---|---|---|
Text field |
Text field |
Select from:
|
Numerical field |
This is a table question which asks for details about your mayor and their time in office. The table provided has the following field headers:
Leader title
State the official title of your mayor.
Leader name
State the full name of your mayor.
Current term end month
Select the month in which your Mayor's current term will end. The Mayor’s end of term is defined by the year when elections to select (or continue the current Mayor’s term) a new mayor are scheduled to occur.
Current term end year
State the year in which your Mayor‘s current term will end. The Mayor’s end of term is defined by the year when elections to select (or continue the current Mayor’s term) a new mayor are scheduled to occur.
Select from Appendix A.
Select from the currencies provided, the full list can be seen in Appendix A of the questionnaire.
The currency selected here will be used for all financial information throughout your response and auto-populated within question tables, such as GDP, operating budget and costs of planned resilience projects in your city.
This should be your preferred currency to report financial information, rather than necessarily the currency of your jurisdiction, as for some cities this may not be appropriate for estimating some project costs.
Please complete the following table:
Current population | Current population year | Projected population | Projected population year |
---|---|---|---|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field |
Local governments are recommended to report the population in the year of their reported inventory in order to enable meaningful comparisons over time and between local governments.
This question asks about your city’s current population size and how it is forecast to change in the future. Report the population in the year of your reported inventory, if possible.
Current population
Give the current population, the number of residents within your city boundaries [as reported in question 0.1] as a whole number.
Current population year
State the year for which the population figure was determined in numerical form.
Projected population
State the projected population of your city as a number.
Projected population year
State the year for which the projected population figure is estimated to be reached, in numerical form.
Please complete the following table:
Land area of the city boundary as defined in question 0.1 (in square km) |
---|
Numerical field |
Land area
State the land area within your city boundaries as a one decimal figure in km2. Please provide the land area that is reflective of your emissions inventory boundary and the year of your reported emissions inventory.
Select one of the following options:
A master plan describes and maps an overall development concept, including present and future land use, urban design and landscaping, built form, infrastructure, circulation and service provision. It is based upon an understanding of place and it is intended to provide a structured approach to creating a clear and consistent framework for development (definition taken from the Scottish government).
If Yes to 1.0:
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Goal type | How are these goals/targets addressed in the city master plan? |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
[Add Row]
The purpose of this question is to understand which sustainability goals or targets your city is implementing in their master plan and is thus impacting on city-wide development planning, further asking for detail of how each target is being addressed.
Goal type
Identify the type of goals and targets that are incorporated in your city’s master plan. The available responses in the drop down menu include:
How are these goals/targets addressed in the city master plan?
Provide further clarification about the answer you have provided in the previous question. Briefly describe how each goal or target is incorporated in your city’s master plan. You can also provide more information about the regional context, relationships with surrounding jurisdictions or the next level of government.
Select one of the following options:
Please respond to indicate whether your city’s Mayor or leadership has made a public commitment to adapt the city to climate change. The available responses in the drop down menu include:
If Yes to 1.1:
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Name of commitment and attach document | Type of commitment | Comments |
---|---|---|
Select from:
| Select from:
| Text field |
[Add Row]
This question allows you to provide more detailed information about the type of adaptation and/or mitigation commitments your mayor or local government has made. Please select from the list of frameworks to identify the name and type of the commitment, attach any relevant documents and provide more details on the specific commitments in the comments field.
Name of commitment and attach document
Select a commitment from the list of values, and attach the document demonstrating your city's commitment, signed by the Mayor, or other senior stakeholder within the city government.
Click on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file you want to upload and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach’ to attach the document.
Type of commitment
If your city's commitment relates to adaptation measures (reducing the vulnerability to climate risk), select "Adaptation". If your city's commitment relates to mitigation or emissions reduction measures (reducing the impact your city has on the environment e.g. emissions or energy reduction), select "Mitigation". If the commitment relates to both adaptation and mitigation, select "Both".
Comments
Please add further comments on your commitment.
If Not intending to undertake to 1.1:
Please complete the following table:
Reason | Explanation |
---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field |
Reason
Select from the following options in the drop-down menu the most appropriate reason for why your Mayor does not have or does not intend to have a commitment to tackle climate adaptation or mitigation:
Comment
If more than one reason exists, select the most pressing immediate barrier, and use the comment field to explain other confounding barriers
Please attach the relevant document here.
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Name of the department | Number of employees in the department | Role in the GCC program | Attach awareness raising and capacity building plan for the municipal staff | Attach organigram or other relevant reference document |
---|---|---|---|---|
Text field | Numerical field | Text field | Text field | Text field and attachment function |
[Add Row]
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Type | Please describe the selected development, challenge, barrier or opportunity | Attach SWOT analysis or SOAR analysis result |
---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field | Text field and attachment function |
[Add Row]
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Name of the stakeholder group | Role in the GCC program | Name of the engagement activities | Aim of the engagement activities | Please attach stakeholder engagement and communication plan | Attach reference document such as meeting minutes, pictures or webpage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Text field | Text field | Text field | Text field | Text field and attachment function | Text field and attachment function |
[Add Row]
Select one of the following options:
Please complete the following table:
Mitigation | Adaptation |
---|---|
Numerical field | Numerical field |
Indicate the number of resources within your city government allocated to climate change mitigation (either reducing the sources of greenhouse gases or enhancing "sinks" to accumulate and store gasses) and climate change adaptation (adjusting to actual or expected future climate).
This is an open text question with an attachment function.
Please note that when copying from another document into the disclosure platform, formatting is not retained.
Numerical field.
Indicate how many staff members (or full time equivalent) are employed to manage and curate the data generated within your team for specific projects or ongoing programmes.
Please complete the following table:
City | Department |
---|---|
Select from:
| Select from:
|
Indicate the level in which your department manages, governs, uses and controls data and information as an asset.
Select all that apply:
This question asks about what software your city / department uses to manage environmental related data. Data management refers to the collection, processing, analysis, storage and communication of data.
Select all that apply:
This question aims to understand the software tools used by your city / department to analyse environmental related data. Data analysis refers to the research, organisation and manipulation of data in a way that brings about useful information.
Select one of the following options:
Select one of the following options:
This section asks how climate change is affecting your city now and may affect it in the future. Further information regarding climate change adaptation analysis is available from the following sources:
Questions 2.0-2.2 ask about your city’s risk or vulnerability assessment processes. A climate change risk and vulnerability assessment is used to determine the nature and extent of risks posed by climate change. This is done by analyzing potential future climate hazards and evaluating existing vulnerabilities to understand the seriousness of the potential impacts on people, assets, services, livelihoods and the environment.
When identifying impacts from climate change, cities should think objectively of the ways in which changes in the climate conditions will affect their city’s ability to conduct business as usual. Information about impacts associated with climate change can be found on the website of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in the report by Working Group II, " Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability "
Climate risk assessment considers the likely frequency of a climate hazard and magnitude of their impacts in a given place or population, based on the exposure of assets to the effects of a hazard, and the vulnerability of the population to loss or damage (IPCC, AR5 WGII SPM, 2014; UNISDR, 2012).
Information about the Climate Hazards faced by cities and driving their exposure to climate and social risks is sought in questions 2.1. Climate hazards are defined as dangerous climate-related physical events that may cause loss of life, injury, or other health impacts, as well as damage and loss to property, infrastructure, livelihoods, service provision, ecosystems, and environmental resources.
Adaptation is covered in Questions 3.0 to 3.2. These questions examine the actions your city takes to adapt to the risks of climate change.
Select one of the following options:
The local government shall prepare and submit a climate risk and vulnerability assessment within two years after committing to GCoM.
Please respond to indicate whether your city has undertaken a climate change risk or vulnerability assessment by selecting the most relevant option from the drop down menu.
The effects of climate change may pose a significant risk to your city’s future development. A climate change risk or vulnerability assessment is a qualitative or quantitative scientific estimation the risks from, hazards associated or vulnerability to climate change. These assessments are most usually done within the context of a decision-making or planning process to address climate change impacts.
Before developing an adaptation plan, it is important to understand how climate change is likely to affect your city - this is usually done by conducting a climate change risk or vulnerability assessment.
A vulnerability assessment is the analysis of the expected impacts, risks and the adaptive capacity of your city to the effects of climate change.
A high-quality vulnerability assessment involves engagement with a broad range of stakeholders. It is important to recognize the diverse expertise that different stakeholders provide Broad engagement can result in identification of previously overlooked areas of vulnerability or in a more nuanced understanding of the root cause of vulnerabilities and hence better-targeted adaptation responses.
More can be read about creating a climate risk or vulnerability assessment in both the:
If Yes or In progress to 2.0:
Please complete the following table:
Primary methodology | Description |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
Answering this question will provide important information for other cities which are assessing their risks from or vulnerability to climate change for the first time and may be interested in the methodology you used.
In the first field, please select the methodology you used to assess the risk in your city. If you have used a different assessment methodology than the ones proposed in the list of values, please select ‘Other’ and indicate the name of the methodology you have used. Select ‘Unknown’ if you do not know on which methodology the assessment was based. If your city uses a combination of methodologies, please select the main methodology used.
Primary methodology
Description
Use the description field to provide more details on how the assessment was carried out. You can include details about whether the assessment covered city operations, private stakeholders, a full range of sectors etc. In particular, if you choose ‘Proprietary Methodology’ or ‘Other’ to describe your methodology, please provide details so that others may understand your approach.
The following resources provide further information about physical risks and the methodology of risk assessment:
If Yes to 2.0:
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Publication title | Year of adoption from local government | Web link | Boundary of assessment relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | Explanation of boundary choice where the asssessment boundary differs from the the city boundary | Areas/Sectors covered by the risk and vulnerability assessment | Primary author of assessment | Does the assessment identify vulnerable populations? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Text field |
Numerical field |
Text field |
Select from:
|
Text field |
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
[Add Row]
Publication title and attach the document
Please state the name of your climate change risk or vulnerability assessment. If a formal assessment of your city’s vulnerabilities to climate change has been done, please attach this document here. Click on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file you want to upload and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach’ to attach the document.
Year of adoption from local government
Please state the year that your climate change risk or vulnerability assessment was published.
Web link
If you would like to provide a web link to your city’s climate change risk or vulnerability assessment in addition to attaching the document, please add the link here.
Boundary of assessment relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1)
Indicate the boundary of your city’s risk or vulnerability assessment relative to your city’s boundary (as reported in 0.1) by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values. CDP recommends cities to develop assessments that cover at least the entire city boundary:
Explanation of boundary choice where the assessment boundary differs from the city boundary
Please explain your choice in the previous field. For example, if your city’s risk assessment covers only part of the city, please use this field to describe which areas your assessment covers and the reason behind this. If your city’s risk assessment covers the entire city and nothing else, there is no need to provide an explanation here.
Areas/sectors covered by the risk and vulnerability assessment
Please select all the relevant sectors or areas that are covered in your city's risk and vulnerability assessment, especially the key areas covered.
Primary author of assessment
Indicate who was predominately responsible for carrying out the risk or vulnerability assessment for your jurisdiction by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
Does the assessment identify vulnerable populations?
Vulnerable populations include individuals or groups of people who are less able than the general population to anticipate, cope with, resist and recover from the impacts of disasters. Vulnerable populations may be described by race or ethnicity, culture, socio-economic status, geography, gender, disability, and age, or other characteristic, and may be disproportionally likely to be affected by climate hazards.
Please find below a breakdown of the information cities and local governments are asked to compile and report on as part of the GCoM new common reporting framework.
Provision level | Information required | To be included in the plan or assessment? | Relevant field in the Cities questionnaire |
---|---|---|---|
Mandatory | The local government shall prepare and submit climate risk and vulnerability assessment within two years after committing to the GCoM. | N/A | Questions 2.0 and 2.0b |
Mandatory | Names of the local government(s) included in the assessment | Yes | “Explanation of boundary choice where the inventory boundary differs from the city boundary” field |
Mandatory | Boundary of assessment which shall be the same as or larger than the city boundary | Yes | “Boundary of assessment relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1)” field in question 2.0b |
Mandatory | Year of approval from local government | Yes | Year of publication or approval from local government” field in question 2.0 |
Mandatory | Lead author team | Yes | “Primary author of assessment” field in question 2.0b |
Mandatory | Data sources | Yes | N/A – to be included in the assessment |
Mandatory | Glossary of key terms and definitions (they shall be consistent with those used in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) or any update published following the AR5, as well as with national frameworks or requirements) | Yes | N/A – to be included in the assessment |
If Not intending to undertake is selected in 2.0:
Please complete the following table:
Reason | Comment |
---|---|
Select one of the following options:
|
Text field |
Reason
Select from the following options in the drop-down menu the most appropriate reason for why city does not have a climate risk and vulnerability assessment:Lack of resources/funding;Comment
If more than one reason exists, select the most pressing immediate barrier, and use the comment field to explain other confounding barriers
Please complete the following table. The table is displayed over several rows for readability. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Climate Hazards | Did this hazard significantly impact your city before 2019? | Current probability of hazard | Current consequence of hazard | Social impact of hazard overall | Future change in frequency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Select from Appendix G |
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Future change in intensity | When do you first expect to experience those changes? | Most relevant assets/ services affected overall | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | Magnitude of expected future impact | Please describe the impacts experienced so far, and how you expect the hazard to impact in the future |
Select from:
| Select from:
| Select from:
| Select from:
| Select from:
| Text field |
[Add Row]
This table question is to identify climate hazards that your city experiences. It asks for current hazards and the probability and anticipated consequence of their impact, as well as their future change in frequency and intensity, and top 3 affected assets/services. An example response has been provided the box below. Responses should be reported in the table provided using the drop down menus where appropriate, as detailed below:
Climate hazards
Indicate the climate hazards that your city experiences either currently or in the future. It is only necessary to select the most significant hazards that your city experiences; table rows can be added or deleted as needed. Please select the ‘most significant’ hazards as relevant to your city’s understanding of significance. To help navigate the list, you will find the climate hazards grouped into major climate hazard category areas.
Climate hazards can be selected from the following list of values:
Did this hazard significantly impact your city before 2019?
Indicate using the drop-down menu whether the climate hazard selected had a significant impact on your city before 2019, to allow identification of hazards previously impacting the city.
Current probability of hazard
Indicate the likelihood of each climate hazard identified in the first field occurring within the next five years. If possible, this response should be based on the outcome of a risk or vulnerability assessment process. If your assessment process has not provided quantitative estimates of likelihood, please estimate using the qualitative descriptors provided below. Select the most appropriate response from the following list of values:
Current consequence of hazard
Indicate the consequence of possible impacts of each climate hazard identified in the first field on your jurisdiction within the next five years. If possible, this response should be based on the outcome of a risk or vulnerability assessment process. If your assessment process has not provided quantitative estimates of level of impact, please estimate using the qualitative descriptors provided below. Select the most appropriate response from the following list of values:
Social impact of hazard overall
Please select all social risks that are expected to occur within your city as a result of the specified climate hazard:
Future change in frequency
Indicate the expected change in frequency of climate change hazards in your jurisdiction based on the following list of values:
Future change in intensity
Indicate the expected change in intensity of climate change hazards in your jurisdiction based on the following list of values:
When do you first expect to experience those changes?
Indicate the timescale at which changes to the frequency and intensity of climate change hazards are expected to occur based on the following list of values:
Most relevant asset or services affected overall
Indicate the critical assets or services in your jurisdiction that will be MOST AFFECTED by the corresponding climate hazard overall in the first field based on the following list of values: [NB: Stakeholders have varied needs and priorities in relation to the risks of climate impacts. This question aims to capture an overview of your city’s overall assessment of the most critical city assets or services impacted by each climate hazard.
Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected
Please select all vulnerable population groups that are expected to be affected by the climate hazard overall. Select all that apply from the list:
Magnitude of impact
Indicate the magnitude to which each climate hazard identified in the first column is expected to affect your city overall by selecting one of the following values:
Please describe the impacts experienced so far, and how you expect the hazard to impact in the future
Provide a general description of how each of the climate hazards identified in the first field has affected the city so far, and how these effects will change in future, including any specific areas within the city where impacts will be felt most and including any interdependencies between various assets and services and any vulnerable populations that may be particularly affected.
The local government shall identify the most significant climate hazards faced by the community. For each identified climate hazard, the local government shall report the following information in question table 2.1:
Past Hazards
Major hazards that occurred in past years can be identified by answering “Yes” to the field asking whether this hazard significantly impacted your city before 2019. If major hazards did occur in past years, the local government shall also report the following information:
Please see below for an example.
Climate hazards | Did this hazard significantly impact your city before 2019? | Probability of hazard | Consequence of hazard | Social impact of hazard overall | Future change in frequency | Future change in intensity | When do you first expect to experience those changes? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Extratropical storm |
No |
Medium |
Medium High |
Increased risk to already vulnerable populations |
Increasing |
Increasing |
Immediately |
Drought |
No |
Medium |
Medium |
Migration from rural areas to cities |
Increasing |
Do not know |
Long-term (after 2050) |
River flood |
Yes |
High |
High |
Fluctuating socio-economic conditions Increased incidence and prevalence of disease |
Do not know |
Increasing |
Immediately |
Most relevant assets/ services affected | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | Magnitude of expected future impact | Please describe the impacts experienced so far, and how you expect the hazard to impact in the future |
---|---|---|---|
| Women & girls Children & youth Elderly Indigenous population | High | With rising global temperatures, the city expects to experience tropical storms in the medium term which will become frequent and affect the local economy, as transport and connectivity will be impacted. |
| Elderly Indigenous population | Medium | With rising global temperatures, the city expects to experience drought in the long-term future and is beginning to understand its impacts and create an adaptation plan. |
| Elderly Low-income households | Medium | The city experiences worsening river flood on a semi-regular basis, no assessment has taken place on change over the future. Previous incidences of flood have impacted emergency management, transport and public health. |
The local government shall identify factors that will most greatly affect its own and the city’s adaptive capacity and enhance climate resilience. For each factor, the local government shall report the following information in question table 2.2:
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Factors that affect ability to adapt | Support / Challenge | Please describe the factor and the degree to which it supports or challenges the adaptive capacity of your city |
---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Text field |
This table question is to identify factors in your jurisdiction that either support or challenge its capacity to adapt to the impacts of future climate hazards. Responses should be reported in the table provided using the drop down menus where appropriate. Please refer to the example table below for more detail.
Factors that affect adaptive capacity
Indicate the major factors that either support or challenge your jurisdiction’s adaptive capacity. Please provide one response per table row, or select the ‘other’ value to add a new factor not listed.
Note that you can select the same factor more than once if that factor both support and challenges your jurisdiction’s adaptive capacity. For example, a jurisdiction experiencing rapid urbanization may benefit from increased economic growth and human capital; however, this trend may also experience significant pressure on infrastructure services that may increase the risk of day-to-day service interruptions, thus weakening the city’s resilience to shock events.
Factors can be selected from the following list of values:
Support / challenge
Indicate whether each of the factors identified in the first field supports or challenges your jurisdiction’s adaptive capacity. Factors that support your adaptive capacity will be those that make adaptation easier, those that challenge will make it more difficult to adapt effectively. For an example response, please refer to the example below.
Please describe the factor and the degree to which it supports or challenges the adaptive capacity of your city
Provide a brief description of how each factor identified in the first field is supporting or challenging your jurisdiction’s adaptive capacity.
Factors that affect ability to adapt | Support/ Challenge | Description |
---|---|---|
Access to quality / relevant data |
Support |
Our city has not had the resources or expertise to develop a thorough adaptation plan, and does not have reliable data in regard to adaptation measures |
Political stability |
Enhance |
Our governance structure is stable and results in good working relationship between the national and city governments in relation to climate change in both resourcing and knowledge sharing |
Rapid urbanization | Support |
Our city is experiencing rapid urbanization, meaning that comprehensive adaptation planning across all divisions of the city is challenging due to it’s rapidly changing nature |
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Climate hazards | Action | Action title | Status of action | Co-benefit area | Action description and implementation progress |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drop-down populated with selections from 2.1 column 1 |
Select from Appendix B |
Text field |
Select from:
|
Select from Appendix H |
Text field |
Finance status | Total cost of the project | Total cost provided by the local government | Primary source fund | Web link |
---|---|---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Select from:
|
Text field |
[Add Row]
Please find below a breakdown of the information cities and local governments are asked to compile and report on as part of the GCoM new common reporting framework.
Provision level | Information required | To be included in the plan or assessment? | Relevant field in the Cities questionnaire |
---|---|---|---|
Mandatory | Brief description of the adaptation action | Yes | “Status of action” and “Action description and implementation progress” fields |
Recommended | Implementation status | Yes | “Status of action” and “Action description and implementation progress” fields |
Recommended | Cost of the action | Yes | “Total cost of project” fields |
Recommended | Timeframe of the action | Yes | “Action description and implementation progress” fields |
Recommended | Financial strategy for implementing the action | Yes | “Primary fund source” and “Action description and implementation progress” fields |
Recommended | Implementing agencies | Yes | “Action description and implementation progress” fields |
Recommended | Stakeholders involved in planning and implementation | Yes | “Action description and implementation progress” fields |
Mandatory | Monitoring report | No - to be reported directly through the questionnaire every two years after submitting the action plan(s). The monitoring reports shall provide information about the implementation status of each action contained in the action plan, helping to monitor progress made. |
Update all fields in question 3.0 |
Climate hazards
This list will be automatically filled with the values you reported in the first field of question 2.1. Please ensure you make a selection in this field, from the list shown which is populated with selections you made in the "Climate hazards" field of question 2.1. Only leave this field blank if your city is taking broad adaptation measures which do not relate to a specific climate hazard.
Action
This field asks to detail the actions you are taking to adapt to climate change. The list of actions that you can select from is located in Appendix B in the questionnaire.
Action title
Use this text box to provide the name (if applicable) of the adaptation action or project your city is undertaking.
Status of action
Select the most appropriate option from the drop-down menu to describe the current stage of implementation of the project or action.
Co-benefit area
Actions taken to adapt to climate change can also provide additional areas of benefit for the city. Please select which areas other than reducing vulnerability are also improved as a result of the action.
Action description and implementation progress
In this field, please give any further relevant comments about the action. Description of actions should include details about: project scope, timescale, current status of implementation, barriers to implementation, collaborators and projected impact on climate hazard.
Finance status
Please select the relevant financial status of the adaptation action from the list provided.
Total cost of the project
Please provide the total expected cost of the project, in numbers with no delimiters. For example $600,000 should be written as 600000. Please ensure you are reporting using the currency selected in 0.4.
Total cost provided by the local government
Please provide the total cost provided by the local government, if any, in numbers with no delimiters. For example $600,000 should be written as 600000. Please ensure you are reporting using the currency selected in 0.4.
Primary fund source
Please select the relevant fund source providing the majority of funding for the project.
Web link
Use this field to provide a link to the project website, where applicable, to provide more information on the initiative.
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is given below.
Climate hazard | Action | Action title | Status of action | Co-benefit area | Action description and implementation progress |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rain storm |
Flood defenses – development and operation & storage |
South City Flood Defense System Review |
Implementation |
|
We are rolling out a number of sea walls and barriers around the port to prevent the low-lying areas in the south coast of the city from flooding. The project is being implemented with construction work beginning in early 2017, expecting to be completed by the end of 2021 |
Heat wave |
Shading in public spaces, markets |
N/A |
Operation |
|
Restaurants are able to expedite the licensing process for outdoor seating if they plant trees to provide shade in the public spaces around the location. |
Finance status | Total cost of project | Total cost provided by the local government | Primary fund source | Web link |
---|---|---|---|---|
Finance secured | 150000000 | [Numerical field] | International (ODA) | www.southcityfloodplan.com/areas |
Finance secured | 40000 | [Numerical field] | Public-private partnership |
Select one of the following options:
Local governments shall develop plans for both climate change mitigation and adaptation (climate resilience), which may be presented in separate plans or an integrated plan. Local governments shall submit their climate action plans to GCoM within three years upon joining GCoM.
Please note that local governments may develop joint action plans with their neighbouring communities.
Please respond to indicate whether your city has produced an adaptation plan, or incorporated adaptation within the context of another long-term plan or strategy by selecting “Yes”, “In progress”, “Intending to undertake in future”, “Not intending to undertake” or “Don’t know” from the drop down menu.
A climate adaptation plan outlines the planned alterations to the city’s systems in response to actual or anticipated climate change. It should cover the services and departments directly managed by the city government and may also consider the actions required by other stakeholders*. The aim of an adaptation plan is to moderate harm or exploit beneficial opportunities from expected climate change and its effects.
*Based on the glossary document of the IPCC
If you wish to see an example of a climate adaptation plan, please refer to Copenhagen’s which can be found here.
If Yes or In progress to 3.1:
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Publication title | Areas covered by adaptation plan | Year of adoption from local government | Boundary of plan relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | If the city boundary is different from the plan boundary, please explain why and any areas / other cities excluded or included? | Stage of implementation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Text field and attachment function |
Select from Appendix E |
Numerical field |
Select from:
|
Text field |
Select from:
|
Type of plan | Has your local government addressed the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits, if any, of the main mitigation and adaptation actions you identified? | Comment or describe the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits of this interaction | Primary author of plan | Description of the stakeholder engagement process | Web link |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Select from:
| Select from:
| Text field | Select from:
| Text field | Text field |
[Add Row]
Please find below a breakdown of the information cities and local governments are asked to compile and report on as part of the GCoM new common reporting framework.
Provision level | Information required | To be included in the plan or assessment? | Relevant field in the Cities questionnaire |
---|---|---|---|
Mandatory | Local governments shall develop plans for both climate change mitigation and adaptation (climate resilience), which may be presented in separate plans or an integrated plan. Local governments shall submit their climate action plans to GCoM within three years upon joining GCoM. | N/A | Questions 3.1 and 3.1a |
Optional | Local governments may develop joint action plans with their neighbouring communities. | Yes | Detail the neighbouring communities included in the plan in the “If the city boundary is different from the plan boundary, please explain why and any areas/other cities excluded or included” field in question 3.1a |
Mandatory | Priority sectors (identified from risk and vulnerability assessments) | Yes | “Areas covered by adaptation plan” field in table question 3.1a |
Mandatory | Date of adoption of the plan | Yes | “Year of adoption” field in table question 3.1a |
Mandatory | Name of the local government(s) which formally adopted the plan | Yes | “If the city boundary is different from the plan boundary, please explain why and any areas/other cities excluded or included” field in table question 3.1a |
Mandatory | Synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits of mitigation and adaptation actions | Yes | “Comment or describe the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits of this interaction” field in table question 3.1a |
Mandatory | Lead author team | Yes | “Primary author of plan” field in table question 3.1a |
Mandatory | Description of the stakeholder engagement processes | Yes | “Description of the stakeholder engagement processes” field in table question 3.1a |
Mandatory | Adaptation and/or climate resilience goals (which shall be aligned with the risks identified in the risk and vulnerability assessment | Yes | Question 3.2 |
Mandatory | Descriptions of the adaptation and/or climate resilience goals, delivery date, and baseline year | Yes | Question 3.2 |
Mandatory | Descriptions for each adaptation action | Yes | Question 3.0 |
Recommended | Metric (or key performance index) for tracking progress and monitoring | Yes | Question 3.2 |
Recommended | Prioritization of adaptation actions | Yes | N/A – to be included in the plan |
Recommended | Policy instruments to implement the adaptation actions | Yes | N/A – to be included in the plan |
Mandatory | Monitoring report | No – to be reported directly through the questionnaire every two years after submitting the action plan(s). The monitoring reports shall provide information about the implementation status of each action contained in the action plan, helping to monitor progress made |
Update all fields in question 3.0 |
Mandatory | The local government shall update and resubmit the action plan(s) when there are significant changes to the existing plan(s). | N.A | Update all fields in question 3.1a |
If you have a climate adaptation plan, please provide additional details about it in this question. Some cities are still working on their climate adaptation plan, attaching it here will enable them to understand your approach better. Please fill in the table with the following information:
Publication title and attach the document
State the official name of your plan that addresses climate change adaptation. Click on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file you want to upload and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach & Save’ to attach the document.
Areas covered by adaptation plan
Select all the relevant main areas that are covered within the adaptation plan from the list.
Year of adoption from local government
Enter the year the plan was published and adopted by the city as a numeric value.
Boundary of assessment relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1)
Indicate the boundary of your city’s adaptation plan relative to your city’s boundary (as reported in 0.1) by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
If the city boundary is different from the plan boundary, please explain why and any areas/other cities excluded or included
Please explain your choice in the previous field. For example, if your city’s risk assessment covers only part of the city, please use this field to describe which areas your plan covers and the reason behind this.
Stage of implementation
Indicate the extent to which your city has implemented its adaptation plan by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
Type of plan
Indicate whether the adaptation plan is a standalone document or integrated into other city plans by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
Has your local government assessed the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits, if any, of the main mitigation and adaptation actions you identified?
Please select from the options to indicate whether your city has assessed the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits, of the main mitigation and adaptation actions identified in the plan. Click here to read more about how to identify potential interactions between climate adaptation and mitigation measures.
Comment or describe the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits of this interaction
Describe the interactions between adaptation and mitigation measures, and how these were assessed.
Primary author of plan
Indicate the primary author responsible for the primary planning document to address climate adaptation in your jurisdiction by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
Description of the stakeholder engagement processes
Please describe the stakeholder engagement processes conducted during the development of the adaptation plan, including stakeholders involved, how the relevant stakeholders were engaged and the results of the engagement.
Web link
If you would like to provide a web link to your city’s climate change risk or vulnerability assessment, in addition to attaching the document, please add the link here.
If Not intending to 3.1:
Please complete the following table:
Reason | Comment |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
Select from the following options in the drop-down menu the most appropriate reason for why you do not have or do not intend to have a climate adaptation plan:
In the comment field please provide more information or context on the reason selected. Such a description should include information about the practical barriers that impact each reason.
For information see the 'Urban Adaptation Support Tool', which has been developed for European cities to support their adaptation efforts.
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Adaptation goal | Target year | Metrics / Indicators | Percentage of target achieved so far | Does this target align with a requirement from a higher level of government? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Text field |
Numerical field |
Text field |
Numerical field | Select from:
|
Please find below a breakdown of the information cities and local governments are asked to compile and report on as part of the GCoM new common reporting framework.
Provision level | Information required | To be included in the plan or assessment? | Relevant field in the Cities questionnaire |
---|---|---|---|
Mandatory | Adaptation and/or climate resilience goals (including sectoral targets if available), which shall be aligned with the risks identified in the risk and vulnerability assessment | Yes | “Adaptation goal” field |
Mandatory | Descriptions of the adaptation and/or climate resilience goals and baseline year | Yes | “Adaptation goal” field |
Mandatory | Delivery date of the adaptation and/or climate resilience goals | Yes | “Target year” field |
Recommended | Metric (or key performance index) for tracking progress and monitoring | Yes | “Metrics/indicators” field |
This question is part of the CRAFT Climate Risk and Adaptation Framework and Taxonomy, answers can be copied across from the corresponding question in the spreadsheet that you reported last year.
This table question is to identify the overarching goals for your jurisdiction’s adaptation efforts, and to understand if and how your jurisdiction plans to monitor and evaluate progress towards these goals.
Adaptation goals
Briefly state (10 to 20 words) your jurisdiction’s main goals for climate adaptation. If possible, these goals should be time bounded, and able to be monitored and evaluated based on specific metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs). Please add or delete table rows as needed for your entries.
Target year
Please enter in numerical form the year by which you anticipate achieving your goal. Please note that the target year cannot be in the past.
Metrics / indicators
If applicable, briefly state (5 to 10 words) the metrics or indicators that are being used to monitor and evaluate progress towards the goals identified in the first field.
Percentage of target achieved so far
Please enter a numerical value for the percentage of your emissions reduction target that you have achieved since the ‘Target year start’, without commas and without the percentage symbol (%). If you have a fixed level target, you can calculate the % of target achieved so far if you have base and current emissions figures.State the target’s percentage completion (in terms of emissions) against the base year emissions. For example, if your target is to reduce your emissions by 10% by 2020 compared with a 2010 base year, and in your reporting year your emissions had reduced by 3% compared to that target base year, your target is 30% complete ((3/10) x 100). If you have met your target in the reporting year, indicate 100% complete.
Does this target align with a requirement from a higher level of government?
Indicate if the adaptation goal set by your jurisdiction relates to a higher level of government such as state, regional or national government
The questions in this section refer to your city’s city-wide (sometimes referred to as “geographic” or “community”) emissions inventory. This inventory encompasses emissions which are within a particular city boundary, over which local governments can exercise a degree of influence through the policies and regulations they implement.
This module gives you the opportunity to disclose your community (or “city-wide”) emissions inventory as well as some other metrics that will provide a holistic picture of your emissions and activities.
This section of the questionnaire is divided into 3 pages:
In general, emissions from local government operations represent only a small portion of overall emissions from the community over which the government has jurisdiction. Capturing community emissions – often referred to as the “geographic” or “city-wide” emissions inventory – creates a snapshot of all local activities and their contribution to global climate change. Collating community emissions can provide a basis from which cities can develop policy and enact regulation with the aim of reducing these emissions.
Global momentum is growing around the protocol created by C40, WRI, ICLEI, and the World Bank, called the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories. A number of large cities have piloted the first version of this methodology in 2013, and the partnership published this full version in 2014. CDP Cities recommend this framework for emissions inventory and it is a requirement of Global Covenant of Mayors reporting compliance.
Many other methodologies exist. It may be the case that individual cities are using methodologies designed for national or regional inventories, but ‘downscaling’ them for their jurisdictions. Thus, using the IPCC national inventory framework as the basic accounting architecture, but tailoring to local circumstances to manage data availability and reliability issues, is one approach. Other examples include the use of Greenhouse Gas Regional Inventory Protocol (GRIP), which, as the name implies, is designed for regional calculations. Some cities have adapted this framework for their boundaries (e.g. Sacramento, California). Even cities that use common approaches produce variations in what is included in their community emissions. The World Bank, UNEP and UN Habitat have also created an emissions inventory protocol for cities (International Standard for Determining Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Cities) (Note that this protocol will be replaced by the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Inventories).
Cities can report their emissions on CDP’s platform regardless of which protocol or methodology they have used to develop their inventory.
By selecting Yes below, you are indicating that you have fuel and/or greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data from the entire city area over which the city government can exercise a degree of influence through the policies and regulations they implement (sometimes referred to as ‘geographic’ or ‘community’ emissions) to report at this time.
Select one of the following options:
City-wide (sometimes referred to as “community” or “geographic”): encompassing emissions which are within a particular geopolitical region, over which local governments can exercise a degree of influence through the policies and regulations they implement.
For more information on the difference between Government and Community emissions inventories, please see the following documents:
If Yes or In Progress to 4.0:
Please complete the following table:
From | To |
---|---|
Drop-down calendar | Drop-down calendar |
Local governments shall submit their greenhouse gas emissions inventory to GCoM within two years upon joining GCoM. Greenhouse gas emissions inventories shall cover a consecutive period of 12 months.
The ORS provides a drop-down calendar for you to enter the dates requested. Entries must be for a 12-month period. Please provide the start date of the period for which your emissions inventory represents in the first field, and the end date of the period for which it represents in the second. If you do not have data for the entire 12-month period, please extrapolate to 12 months.
If Yes or In Progress to 4.0:
Please complete the following table:
Boundary of inventory relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) |
Excluded sources/areas | Explanation of boundary choice where the inventory boundary differs from the city boundary (include inventory boundary, GDP and population) |
---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field | Text field |
Boundary of inventor relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1)
Indicate the boundary of your city-wide emissions inventory relative to your city’s boundary (as reported in 0.1) by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
Excluded sources/areas
Please explain your choice in the previous field. For example, if your city-wide emissions inventory covers only part of the city or includes areas outside the city boundary, please use this field to describe which areas your plan covers and which are excluded.
Explanation of boundary choice where the inventory boundary differs from the city boundary (include inventory boundary, GDP and population)
Please explain the reason for the exclusions or inclusions identified in the previous column. For example if an area within the city boundary such as the port has been excluded, please explain why.
Local governments shall consider all categories of emission sources and report all emissions that are significant. Exclusion of emission sources shall be disclosed and justified.
Please note that local governments may develop joint GHG inventories with their neighbouring communities. Please detail the neighbouring communities included in the inventory in the “Explanation of boundary choice where the inventory boundary differs from the city boundary” field.
If Yes or In progress to 4.0:
Please complete the following table:
Primary protocol | Comment |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
In the ORS, you will see a list of methodologies developed by third parties. Please select the primary methodology that you followed in measuring greenhouse gas emissions for your community. If you do not see your chosen methodology reflected in the list please select “Other” and describe your methodology.
The values provided are:
Please select “Other” if you use a proprietary methodology or a third party methodology that you do not see listed here. Enter the name of the methodology in the text box provided.
In the “Comment” field please provide more detail on the methodology used on which you base the majority of your calculations or whether you utilized a combination of protocols.
Local governments may use existing GHG emissions inventory reporting protocols and tools available from GCoM partners or other bespoke tools, as long as all mandatory information outlined in the GCoM framework are provided. Cities will also be asked to report their summary emissions data in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework (CRF), to encourage standard reporting of emissions data.
The city-wide GHG emissions inventory shall report emissions occurring from different sectors as well as distinguish between direct and indirect emissions. This is aligned with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, as well as some other commonly used GHG accounting and reporting frameworks.
If Yes to 4.0 and GPC selected in 4.3:
Select one of the following options:
Local governments may use existing GHG emissions inventory reporting protocols and tools available from GCoM partners or other bespoke tools, as long as all mandatory information outlined in the GCoM framework are provided. Cities will also be asked to report their summary emissions data in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework (CRF), to encourage standard reporting of emissions data.
The city-wide GHG emissions inventory shall report emissions occurring from different sectors as well as distinguish between direct and indirect emissions. This is aligned with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, as well as some other commonly used GHG accounting and reporting frameworks.
If Yes or In progress to 4.0:
Select all that apply:
The inventory shall quantify emissions of the following gases: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). All GHG emissions data should be reported as metric tonnes of each gas, and/or metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (CO2e).
The list consists of the main greenhouse gases defined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), as well as nitrogen trifluoride (NF3).
If Yes to 4.0:
If you have an inventory in the format of the GPC, please attach it below. If you are using the ClearPath tool, please attach both extracts in the table below. If your inventory is not in the format of the GPC, you can also attach it below.
Please complete the following table.You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Emissions inventory format | Document title and attachment | Emissions factors used | Global Warming Potential (select relevant IPCC Assessment Report) | Please select if these additional sectors are included in the inventory | Population in inventory year | Overall Level of confidence | Comment on level of confidence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Text Field and attachment function |
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
|
Numerical field |
Select from:
|
Text field |
[Add Row]
Emission sources
Local governments shall report GHG emissions from at least three main sectors, namely stationary energy, transportation, and waste. Additionally, local governments shall report GHG emissions from energy generation activities, but to avoid double counting, these shall not form part of the GHG emissions inventory total. Local governments shall consider all categories of emission sources and report all emissions that are significant. Exclusion of emission sources shall be disclosed and justified.
Notation Keys
Notation keys may be used to accommodate limitations in data availability and differences in emission sources between local governments. Where notation keys are used, an accompanying explanation shall be provided.
The following are the descriptions on how to use the notation keys:
Activity Data and Emission Factors
All relevant activity data, emission factors, data sources, methodologies, assumptions, exclusions and deviations shall be documented and reported for all sources of emissions, disaggregated by activity/fuel type. Local governments shall account for emissions of the following gases: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) and report them in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (CO2e), and by individual GHG where possible.
Tools to compile your inventory
Various tools have been produced to help cities develop a city-wide inventory in the format of a GPC, CDP recommends the CIRIS GPC reporting tool (City Inventory Reporting and Information System) which you can use to enter your breakdown of fuel use and emissions by subsector and scope according to the requirements of the GPC, or the ClearPath tool to report their GPC inventories
Using ClearPath
ClearPath is ICLEI’s online GHG inventory tool for local governments worldwide. Cities using the ClearPath tool can report their GPC inventories through the CDP platform by following the instructions below.
In the ClearPath tool, please click on the ‘Reports’ tab to access your data summary reports and extract your inventory data in in .xls format. You will have the option of exporting your GPC inventory in various formats, identify the two formats detailed below and click on ‘export’ on the far right of the table to start the downloading process (see screenshot below).
Reports to extract:
These two reports contain the data points that will be checked against the Global Covenant of Mayors framework. Once extracted, please save the two reports onto your computer and attach them to the table.
Inventory format
Please note Macro-Enabled workbooks that use the “.xlsm” format (e.g. CIRIS, earlier versions of the GPC reporting tool) should be saved as Excel workbooks “.xlsx” in order to be attached to the questionnaire.
If you have an inventory in the format of the GPC, please attach it below. You can download the GPC Reporting Tool (CIRIS) here. If you are using the ClearPath tool, please attach both extracts in the table below. If your inventory is not in the format of a GPC, you can also attach it below.
Please note Macro-Enabled workbooks that use the “.xlsm” format (e.g. CIRIS, earlier versions of the GPC reporting tool) should be saved as Excel workbooks “.xlsx” in order to be attached to the questionnaire.
Emissions inventory format
Select the format of your inventory from the options provided in the drop down menu.
Document title and attachment
Provide the title of your emissions inventory. Use this field to attach your city’s inventory. You can do this by clicking “Chose file”, navigating to the inventory file and clicking “Attach”.
Emissions factors used
Please select which emissions factors are used in the city-wide emissions inventory. An emission factor is a representative value that attempts to relate the quantity of a pollutant released to the atmosphere with an activity associated with the release of that pollutant.
Global Warming Potential (select relevant IPCC Assessment Report)
Please select which IPCC Assessment Report Global Warming Potential values have been used in the city-wide emissions inventory. Global warming potential (GWP) is a measure of how much heat a greenhouse gas traps in the atmosphere up to a specific time horizon, relative to carbon dioxide.
Please select if these additional sectors are included in the inventory
Please identify if any of the following optional additional sectors have been included in the calculation of your city-wide emissions inventory.
Population in inventory year
Overall level of confidence
Please select the level of confidence associated with your total emissions figure.
Comment on level of confidence
Use this text box to comment on your selection in the Level of confidence drop down
If Yes – use the CRF format is selected in 4.3a OR any selection other than Global Protocol for Community Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories is selected in 4.3:
Please complete the following table:
Sectors and sub-sectors | Direct emissions / Scope 1 (metric tonnes CO2e) | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | Indirect emissions from the use of grid-supplied electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling / Scope 2 (metric tonnes CO2e) | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | Emissions occurring outside the city boundary as a result of in-city activities / Scope 3 (metric tonnes CO2e) | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | Please explain any excluded sources, identify any emissions covered under an ETS and provide any other comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stationary energy > Residential buildings | Numerical field | Select from:
|
Numerical field | Select from:
|
Numerical field | Select from:
|
Text field |
Stationary energy > Commercial buildings & facilities | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Stationary energy > Institutional buildings and facilities | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Stationary energy > Industrial buildings & facilities | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Stationary energy > Agriculture | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Stationary energy > Fugitive emissions | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector | Not applicable for this sub-sector | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Total Stationary Energy | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Transportation > On-road | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Transportation > Rail | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Transportation > Waterborne navigation | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Transportation > Aviation | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Transportation > Off-road | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Total Transport | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Waste > Solid waste disposal | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Waste > Biological treatment | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Waste > Incineration and open burning | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Waste > Wastewater | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Total Waste | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
IPPU > Industrial process | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
IPPU > Product use | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Total IPPU | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
AFOLU > Livestock | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above |
Same as above |
AFOLU > Land use | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
AFOLU > Other AFOLU | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector | Not applicable for this sub-sector | Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Total AFOLU | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Generation of grid-supplied energy > Electricity-only generation | Same as above | Same as above |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Generation of grid-supplied energy > CHP generation | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Generation of grid-supplied energy > Heat/cold generation | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Generation of grid-supplied energy > Local renewable generation | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above | Same as above | Same as above |
Total Generation of grid-supplied energy | Same as above | Same as above | Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Not applicable for this sub-sector |
Same as above |
Total Emissions (excluding generation of grid-supplied energy) | Same as above | Same as above | Numerical field | Select from:
|
Numerical field | Select from:
|
Same as above |
Cities will also be asked to report their summary emissions data in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework (CRF), to encourage standard reporting of emissions data.
Emission sources
Local governments shall report GHG emissions from at least three main sectors, namely stationary energy, transportation, and waste. Additionally, local governments shall report GHG emissions from energy generation activities, but to avoid double counting, these shall not form part of the GHG emissions inventory total. Local governments shall consider all categories of emission sources and report all emissions that are significant. Exclusion of emission sources shall be disclosed and justified.
Notation Keys
Notation keys may be used to accommodate limitations in data availability and differences in emission sources between local governments. Where notation keys are used, an accompanying explanation shall be provided.
The following are the descriptions on how to use the notation keys:
If Global Protocol for Community Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories is selected in 4.3 and No – continue reporting using the GPC format to 4.3a:
Please complete the following table:
Sector and scope (GPC reference number) | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Where data is not available, please explain why |
---|---|---|
Stationary Energy: energy use – Scope 1 (I.X.1) | Numerical field | Text field |
Stationary Energy: energy use – Scope 2 (I.X.2) | Numerical field | Text field |
Stationary Energy: energy use – Scope 3 (I.X.3) | Numerical field | Text field |
Stationary Energy: energy generation supplied to the grid – Scope 1 (I.4.4) | Numerical field | Text field |
Transportation – Scope 1 (II.X.1) | Numerical field | Text field |
Transportation – Scope 2 (II.X.2) | Numerical field | Text field |
Transportation – Scope 3 (II.X.3) | Numerical field | Text field |
Waste: waste generated within the city boundary – Scope 1 (III.X.1) | Numerical field | Text field |
Waste: waste generated within the city boundary – Scope 3 (III.X.2) | Numerical field | Text field |
Waste: waste generated outside the city boundary – Scope 1 (III.X.3) | Numerical field | Text field |
Industrial Processes and Product Use – Scope 1 (IV) | Numerical field | Text field |
Agriculture, Forestry and Land Use – Scope 1 (V) | Numerical field | Text field |
TOTAL Scope 1 (Territorial) emissions | Numerical field | Text field |
TOTAL Scope 2 emissions | Numerical field | Text field |
TOTAL Scope 3 emissions | Numerical field | Text field |
TOTAL BASIC emissions | Numerical field | Text field |
TOTAL BASIC+ emissions | Numerical field | Text field |
The GPC standard classifies GHG emissions into “scopes,” depending on where they physically occur, and into six main sectors, which are then broken down by sub-sectors. If you have chosen to report using the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC), (WRI, C40 and ICLEI), please use the embedded table to disaggregate and report your emissions by sector and by scope, as according to table 4.2 of the GPC:
Sector and Scope (GPC reference number)
Please fill in every row of the table with the relevant emissions. Remember to only report data for the 12 month time-period selected in Q 4.1.
- ‘BASIC’ emissions includes scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from stationary energy and transportation, as well as scope 1 and scope 3 emissions from waste.
- ‘BASIC+’ additionally includes emissions from IPPU and AFOLU and transboundary transportation (scope 3 'energy use' and 'transportation').
Emissions (Metric Tonnes CO2e)
Enter the corresponding quantity of emissions in metric tonnes CO2e. If there are no emissions occuring within your city relating to a specific sector/scope, please indicate this with a 0.
Where data is not available, please explain why
Use this field to indicate why emissions data is not provided. This could be due to a lack of available information or due to the scope of the inventory.
Emission sources
Local governments shall report GHG emissions from at least three main sectors, namely stationary energy, transportation, and waste. Additionally, local governments shall report GHG emissions from energy generation activities, but to avoid double counting, these shall not form part of the GHG emissions inventory total. Local governments shall consider all categories of emission sources and report all emissions that are significant. Exclusion of emission sources shall be disclosed and justified.
Notation Keys
Notation keys may be used to accommodate limitations in data availability and differences in emission sources between local governments. Where notation keys are used, an accompanying explanation shall be provided.
The following are the descriptions on how to use the notation keys:
If any methodology other than GPC is selected in 4.3 and if Yes selected in response to 4.0:
Please complete the following table:
Scope | Metric tonnes CO2e | Level of confidence |
---|---|---|
Scope 1 emissions excluding emissions from grid-supplied energy generation | Numerical field | Select from:
|
Scope 1 emissions from grid-supplied energy generation within the city boundary | Numerical field | Select from:
|
Total Scope 1 emissions (Row 1 + Row 2) | Numerical field | Select from:
|
Total Scope 2 emissions | Numerical field | Select from:
|
Total (Scope 1 + Scope 2) emissions | Numerical field | Select from:
|
Total Scope 3 emissions | Numerical field | Select from:
|
If you categorize your emissions by scope, please enter the appropriate figures for your Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions. Where values are not available, please use the comment field to indicate the reason why.
For example, if your city has only calculated scope 1 emissions, provide this in rows 1, 2 and 3, and leave scope 2 and 3 emissions blank.
Scope
This table question breaks down emissions into scope 1, 2 and scope 3. Scope 1 emissions are further split into emissions excluding grid-supplied energy generation and emissions exclusively from grid-supplied energy generation within your city boundaries. For more information on 'scopes' consult the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC), (WRI, C40 and ICLEI).
Metric tonnes CO2e
Your answers will be numeric entries (metric tonnes of CO2e) in the second field. If you do not break down your scope 1 emissions in this way, then please still fill in your “total scope 1 emissions” in this row.
Level of confidence
Please select the level of confidence associated with your total emissions figure.
Comments
If you do not have the full breakdown of your city’s emissions by scope, please use the comments field to indicate this, and any reasoning you may have.
If 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories or International Standard for Determining Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Cities (UNEP and World Bank) is selected in 4.3 and if Yes selected in response to 4.0:
Please complete the following table.You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
IPCC sector | Sector | Scope | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) |
---|---|---|---|
Select from:
| Select from:
| Select from:
| Numerical field |
The purpose of this question is to understand the brekadown of your city's emissions by sector, as defined by the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
You are provided with a table in the ORS to structure your repsonse. Using the 'Add row' function in this table allows you to report your city's emisisons breakdown using multiple sectors and scopes.
IPCC Sector: Please select the relevant sector as defined by the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:
Sector: Please indicate the relevant GHG emissions sub-sector from the drop down options
Scope: Please indicate the scope considered for each sector
Emissions: Emissions associated with that sector
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
IPCC Sector | Sector | Scope | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) |
---|---|---|---|
Energy |
Stationary energy (buildings) |
Scope 1 |
475000 |
Energy |
Public buildings |
Scope 2 |
15000 |
Energy |
Transport |
Scope 1 |
35000 |
Industrial Processes and Product Use (IPPU) |
Waste |
Scope 1 |
10000 |
Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) |
Transport |
Scope 1 |
30000 |
Waste |
Waste |
Scope 1 |
50000 |
If U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (ICLEI) is selected in 4.3 and if Yes selected in response to 4.0:
Please complete the following table.You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
US Community Protocol Sources | Sector | Scope | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) |
---|---|---|---|
Select from:
| Select from:
| Select from:
| Numerical field |
The purpose of this question is to understand the breakdown of your city's emissions by source. You are provided with a table in the ORS to structure your response. Using the 'Add row' function in this table allows you to report your city's emissions breakdown using multiple sectors and scopes.
U.S. Community Protocol Sources: Please select the relevant sector as defined by the U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (ICLEI):
Sector: Please indicate the relevant GHG emissions sub-sector from the drop down options
Scope: Please indicate the scope considered for each sector
Emissions: Emissions associated with that sector
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
US Community Protocol Sources | Sector | Scope | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) |
---|---|---|---|
Upstream impacts of community‐wide activities |
Stationary energy (buildings) |
Scope 1 |
475000 |
Upstream impacts of community‐wide activities |
Public buildings |
Scope 2 |
15000 |
Upstream impacts of community‐wide activities |
Transport |
Scope 1 |
35000 |
Built Environment |
Waste |
Scope 1 |
10000 |
Agricultural livestock |
Transport |
Scope 1 |
30000 |
Solid Waste |
Waste |
Scope 1 |
50000 |
If Regional or country specific methodology, City specific methodology or Other is selected in 4.3 and if Yes selected in response to 4.0:
Please complete the following table.You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Source | Sector | Scope | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) |
---|---|---|---|
Text field | Select from:
| Select from:
| Numerical field |
The purpose of this question is to learn more about how your city government breaks down emissions, which can be valuable information for comparative understanding between cities. Please note that this question is flexible to accommodate many of the different kinds of categories used by cities.
You are provided with a table in the ORS to structure your response. Examples of how your city might characterize and differentiate emissions are listed below and also shown in an example table:
Source: Please indicate the source of emissions, for example: buildings, transport, water utilities, wastewater utilities, etc. using the relevant classification system as instructed by your inventory methodology.
Sector: Please indicate which the relevant GHG emissions sector from the drop down options
Scope: please indicate the scope considered for each sector
Emissions: emissions associated with that sector
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
Source | Sector | Scope | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) |
---|---|---|---|
Buildings |
Buildings |
Scope 1 |
475000 |
Water |
Water |
Scope 1 |
15000 |
Waste |
Waste |
Scope 1 |
10000 |
Transport |
Transport |
Scope 1 |
30000 |
Other |
Other |
Scope 1 |
5000 |
If Yes to 4.0:
Please complete the following table:
Year of inventory as baseline of the target | Baseline synthesis report | Data gap analysis report | Stakeholder consultation reference document for this inventory, including consultation process and results |
---|---|---|---|
Numerical field | Text field and attachment function | Text field and attachment function | Text field and attachment function |
If Yes to 4.0
Please complete the following table:
Change in emissions | Reason for change | Please explain and quantify changes in emissions |
---|---|---|
Select from:
| If “Increased” or "Decreased" is selected:
| Text field |
The purpose of this table question is to understand the change in your emissions over time and the factors which have led to that change. Changes in emissions could be due to emissions reduction actions, changes to your electricity mix, changes in methodology etc.
In the ‘Change in emissions’ field, please select how your emissions have changed compared to the emissions you reported last time:
Reason for change
Please select from the drop down menu to indicate some of the reasons you have identified that led to the change in emissions.
For example, if you previously reported emissions from 2012 and you are now reporting emissions from 2014 please explain any material difference in the figures. For instance, your city may have changed the emissions accounting methodology which may have affected the figures.
Please explain and quantify changes in emissions
Please provide more information or context on the reasons for change that you have selected. Please include the percentage or absolute amount of emissions that have changed since your last inventory. If the change in emissions is due to several factors, please select the reason for the most significant change and use this column to explain any other factors.
In cases where there is no change from data previously reported indicate that there is no change and why.
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
Change in emissions | Reason for change | Please explain and quantify changes in emissions |
---|---|---|
Decreased |
Technological change |
City-wide GHG emissions were 5% lower in 2015 compared to 2012, when we last reported our inventory. This is due to a successful home energy efficiency program and further de-carbonization of the national electricity grid |
If Yes to 4.0:
Please complete the following table:
Response | Provide an overview and attach your consumption-based inventory if relevant |
---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field and attachment function |
Consumption-based greenhouse gas accounting is an alternative to the sector and scope approach to measuring city-wide emissions. This focuses on the consumption of goods and services (such as food, clothing, electronic equipment, etc.) by residents of a city, and GHG emissions are reported by consumption category rather than GHG emission source category. Consumption-based GHG emissions of cities are often significantly larger than the those calculated under alternative methods that focus primarily on GHG emissions taking place within the city boundary. Select the relevant option to indicate whether your city has conducted a consumption-based emissions inventory.
If Yes to 4.0:
Select one of the following options:
City governments (or any large organization) may see value in having external verification or auditing of their emissions and emission reduction efforts. This can ensure higher levels of quality control / quality assurance.
Please answer by selecting “Yes”; “In progress”; “Intending to undertake in the next two years”; “Not intending to undertake”; or “Don’t know” from the drop down menu provided.
For more information about external verification see chapter 12 of the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GPC)
If Yes to 4.11:
Please complete the following table:
Name of verifier and attach verification certificate | Year of verification | Please explain which parts of your inventory are verified |
---|---|---|
Text field and attachment function | Numerical field | Text field |
This is a table question with fields to provide an opportunity to describe relevant information about this verification process with the following headings:
Name of verifier and attach verification certificate
List the names of organizations which have verified your greenhouse gas emissions and provide proof of verification in the form of an attachment. This function allows you to attach your verification certificate document. To attach a document click on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file you want to upload and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach & Save’ to attach the document.
Year of verification
State the year in which the verification occurred.
Please explain which parts of your inventory are not verified
If the inventory is only verified for certain sectors or scopes, please identify here which parts of the inventory are not covered by the verification. You can also use this field to provide additional details on your verification process, such as:
If Not intending to undertake or Intending to undertake in the next 2 years to 4.11:
Please complete the following table:
Reason | Comments |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
Please give more details on whether and how you plan to verify your emissions related to your local government operations in the future by selecting an option from the drop down options in the “Reason” field; providing a comment on this selection in the “Comments” field.
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Inventory date from | Inventory date to | Scopes/boundary covered | Previous emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Is this inventory used as the base year inventory? | Methodology | File name and attach your inventory | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date field | Date field | Select from:
|
Numerical field | Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Text field and attachment function | Text field |
Please use the table to provide details on any historical emissions inventories your city may have, including a base year inventory where possible. The base year inventory should detail emissions by source within the city boundary to allow an understanding of the emissions in the base year, which are especially important in analyzing sector specific emissions reductions targets and how far the city has reached in achieving those targets.
Please ensure each inventory covers an accounting period of 12-months, provide an indication of which scopes are covered by the inventory and which methodology was used to develop the inventory. Please ensure the inventory document is attached in Excel format.
If Yes to 4.0:
Select one of the following options:
This question gives cities the opportunity to update previously submitted emissions figures.
All emissions over time should be estimated consistently, which means that as far as possible, the time series should be calculated using the same methods, data sources and boundary definitions in all years. Using different methods, data or applying different boundaries in a time series may result in an unrepresentative change of figures, as a result of methodological refinements, rather than a real change in emissions or removals.
Cities may undergo significant changes, which will alter a city’s historical emissions profile and make meaningful comparisons over time difficult. In order to maintain consistency over time, emissions for previous years should be retroactively recalculated to reflect changes in the city that would otherwise compromise the consistency and relevance of the reported GHG emissions information.
If Yes to 4.13:
Please complete the following table.You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Inventory date from | Inventory date to | Scope | Previous emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Updated emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Updated methodology | File name and attach your new inventory | Reasoning for recalculation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date field |
Date field |
Select from:
|
Numerical field |
Numerical field |
Select from:
|
Text field and attachment function |
Text field |
[Add Row]
Indicate the emissions 'scope' for which figures have been recalculated, as well as the inventory period, change in figures and methodology.
Attach the updated inventory and explain the reasoning and impact behind the recalculation.
For more details on recalculating emissions see chapter 11 of the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GPC)
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
Inventory date from | Inventory date to | Scope | Previous emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Updated emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Updated methodology | File name and attach your new inventory | Reasoning
for
recalculation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01.01.2015 |
31.12.2015 |
Scope 3 |
8000 |
9000 |
Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) |
Inv_update |
We have an updated methodology for |
Select all that apply:
A GHG emissions reduction target is a commitment to reduce, or limit the increase of, GHG emissions or emissions intensity by a specified quantity, to be achieved by a future date. To respond to this question, please tick the box(es) to indicate the type(s) of city-wide emissions reduction target(s) your city currently has in place. Please note this question applies to community (city-wide) emission reduction targets only.
For more information on the definitions of each target type, please see the descriptions below, and refer to the Mitigation Goal Standard, developed by the World Resources Institute (WRI). If your city does not have an emissions reduction target for city-wide emissions, please only select “No target”.
Base year emissions (absolute) target
A base year emissions (absolute) target is a commitment to reduce or controls the increase of emissions by a specified quantity relative to a base year.
For example, a 25% reduction of absolute emissions from 1990 levels by 2020.
Fixed level target
Fixed level goals represent a reduction in emissions to an absolute emissions level by a target year. For example “to achieve 200Mt CO2e by 2020”. Carbon neutrality goals are the most common type of fixed level goal, for example: “to reach net zero emissions by 2050”.
Base year intensity target
A base year intensity target is a commitment to reduce a city’s emissions intensity (emissions per unit of another variable, typically GDP) by a specified quantity relative to a base year.
For example, a 40% reduction of emissions per GDP from 1990 levels by 2020.
Baseline scenario (business as usual) target
A baseline scenario (business as usual) target is a commitment to reduce emissions by a specified quantity relative to a projected emissions baseline scenario, also referred to as a business as usual scenario. A baseline scenario is a reference case that represents future events or conditions most likely to occur in the absence of activities taken to meet the mitigation goal.
For example, a 30% reduction from baseline scenario emissions in 2020.
No target
If your city does not currently have any emissions targets in place, please only select “No target”.
Please find below a breakdown of the information cities and local governments are asked to compile and report on as part of the GCoM new common reporting framework.
Provision level | Information required | Relevant field in the Cities questionnaire | |
---|---|---|---|
Mandatory | GHG emissions reduction target | Local governments shall submit their greenhouse gas emissions reduction target(s) to GCoM within two years upon joining GCoM. | Questions 5.0 and 5.0a/b/c/d |
Mandatory | Target boundary | The target boundary shall be consistent with all emissions sources included in the GHG emissions inventory, with the possibility to exclude sources that are not controlled by the local government. | “Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1)” field |
Mandatory | Target boundary (if different to the inventory boundary) | In case that the target boundary does not align with the inventory boundary, any additions or exclusions shall be specified and justified. | “Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions” field |
Optional | Target boundary (if reporting a joint target) | Local governments may develop joint targets with their neighbouring communities. | Detail the neighbouring communities included in the target in the “Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1)” and “Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions” fields |
Mandatory | Target year | The target year shall be the same as, or later than, the target year adopted in the Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) or as set by your Regional/National Covenants (See e.g. UNFCCC NDC List, Climate Tracker, CLIMATEWATCH). Cities that set a target year beyond 2030 shall also include an interim target between now and 2030. | Target year” field |
Recommended | Base year (only for base year emissions target and base year intensity target) | The base year should be the same as the base year used in the NDC or as set by Regional/National Covenants. Where the base year is different from the NDC (e.g. where a city has previously adopted another base year or due to a lack of data availability), this shall be explained. | “Base year” field |
Mandatory | Ambition | At a minimum, the target shall be as ambitious as the unconditional components of the NDC. When a national government increases their NDC, local governments shall have a maximum of five years to ensure their target remains as ambitious as the unconditional components of the NDC. Targets shall be reported as a percentage (%) reduction from the base year or scenario year (for base year emissions, base year intensity and baseline scenario targets). Many countries have submitted two sets of NDC targets: unconditional targets, to be implemented without any explicit external support; and conditional targets. The latter are more ambitious than unconditional targets and require external support for their fulfilment. This includes financial support, and policies or action in other countries which support or facilitate a given country’s mitigation policy (e.g. adoption of carbon taxes in a particular country may be conditional on the widespread use of carbon taxes in other countries, to ensure that domestic industry is not unduly impacted). |
“Percentage reduction target” field |
Mandatory | Units | The absolute emissions in the target year(s) in metric tonnes CO2e shall also be reported for all target types. If possible, the same approach should be chosen as is the case for the NDC target. | “Target year absolute emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)” field |
Mandatory | Use of transferable emissions | Transferable emissions are emissions allowances and offset credits from market mechanisms outside the target boundary that are used toward meeting a target. Please refer to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Mitigation Goal Standard for more details. The use of transferable emissions units is only permissible when a local government’s target ambition exceeds the unconditional components of the NDC. Where this is the case, the local government shall report the target, with and without the transferable emissions units, as well as identify the source of the transferable emissions units. |
Question 5.3 and 5.3a |
Mandatory | Conditionality | The use of conditional components is only permissible when a local government’s target ambition exceeds the unconditional components of the NDC. Any conditional components included in the target shall be identified and, where possible, the conditional components should also be quantified. Conditional components include where cities set a stretch target, or where actions are identified for other key stakeholders beyond that which they have committed to themselves (for example, where a local government assumes a more ambitious reduction in the carbon-intensity of the national electricity grid than that committed to in the NDC or official government policy). | Questions 5.2 and 5.2a |
Mandatory | Baseline scenario target | For a baseline scenario target, the modelling methodologies, and parameters shall be transparently described | Question 5.0d |
If “Base year emissions (absolute) target” is selected in 5.0:
Please complete the following table.You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Sector | Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions | Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | Base year | Year of target implementation | Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Percentage reduction target |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field | Select from:
|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field |
Target year | Target year absolute emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Percentage of target achieved so far | Does this target align with the global 1.5 - 2°c pathway set out in the Paris Agreement? | Please indicate to which sector(s) the target applies | Does this target align to a requirement from a higher level of sub-national government? | Please describe your target. If your country has an NDC and your city’s target is less ambitious than the NDC, please explain why. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Text field |
[Add Row]
Please refer to the guidance of question 5.0 (emissions reduction target) to understand the requirements of the GCoM Common Reporting Framework.
Please ensure to report long (2051+), medium (2026-2050) and short term (present-2025) targets if you have them.
Provide the details of your city’s base year emissions (absolute) target in the table provided under the following headings:
Sector
Please select ‘Total city-wide emissions’ to report the emissions reduction target for your total city-wide emissions inventory. If you have sector breakdowns of your city-wide emissions reduction target, please add a row and select the relevant sector.
Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions
Please use this field to explain any additional inclusions or exclusions in the target sectors in comparison with the inventory sectors.
Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1)
Indicate the boundary of your emissions reduction target relative to your city’s boundary (as reported in 0.1) by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
Base year
Please enter the appropriate year to the numerical field provided. Your base year (also known as the “representative year”) is the reference year from which your greenhouse gas reductions are measured. Please ensure the base year corresponds to the total emissions inventory if Total is selected in the sector field. If you are reporting a target for a specific sector of your local government inventory, please provide the base year for that sector.
Year of target implementation
Please enter in numerical format the year in which your target came into effect or was approved by the local government. This differs from your base year which is used as a reference year from which to measure or compare emissions.
Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)
Please enter the numerical value for the emissions in your base year, without commas. Your base emissions are the greenhouse gas emissions from your base year on which your target is based. Please ensure the base year emissions pertains to the total emissions inventory if Total is selected in the sector field. If you are reporting a target for a specific sector of your city-wide emissions inventory, please provide the base year emissions for that sector. Please ensure that the base year emissions correspond with the base year reported.
Percentage reduction target
Please enter the numerical value of your percentage reduction target, without commas and without the percentage symbol (%). If your target is not currently expressed as a percentage, please convert it into this format (for example an absolute emissions reduction in metric tonnes CO2e can be converted into a percentage reduction relative to the base year). If this is not possible, please note your target reduction and other relevant detail in the “Comment” field for this question.
Target year
Please enter in numerical form the year by which you anticipate achieving your goal. Please note that the target year cannot be in the past.
Target year absolute emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)
Please indicate the absolute emissions expected in the target year when the target is achieved. For example, if a 20% reduction on 2000000 tC02e is the goal for 2030, then in 2030 the expected absolute emissions would be 1600000 tC02e.
Percentage of target achieved so far
Please enter a numerical value for the percentage of your emissions reduction target that you have achieved since the ‘Target year start’, without commas and without the percentage symbol (%). If you have a fixed level target, you can calculate the % of target achieved so far if you have base and current emissions figures.State the target’s percentage completion (in terms of emissions) against the base year emissions. For example, if your target is to reduce your emissions by 10% by 2020 compared with a 2010 base year, and in your reporting year your emissions had reduced by 3% compared to that target base year, your target is 30% complete ((3/10) x 100). If you have met your target in the reporting year, indicate 100% complete. It is not possible to put values greater than 100% in this field; however if you have exceeded your target, explain in the Comment field.
If you set an absolute target to stabilize your greenhouse gas emissions against a base year, enter 0 (zero) until the target year. For example, if a city sets an absolute target to cap emissions using a 2008 base year and a 2019 target year. For reporting years until 2019, they would enter 0 (zero) in this column, before entering 100% in 2019 if they have achieved their target.
Does this target align with the global 1.5-2°C pathway set out in the Paris Agreement?
The Paris agreement set out a pathway to keep global temperature increase to well below 2 degrees. Many cities are developing targets in line with the Paris agreement goals, such as New York City's 80% by 2050 reduction target. If your city's target is aligned with the Paris agreement goals, please select the relevant option from the list.
Please indicate to which sector(s) the target applies
Please use this field to select all sectors that are covered under the target
Does this target align to a requirement from a higher level of sub-national government?
Please select the relevant option from the list to indicate whether the target aligns with a requirement set by county, state or regional government.
Please describe your target. If your country has an NDC and your city’s target is less ambitious than the NDC, please explain why
Describe your target in this field and where your city's target is less ambitious than your country's NDC, please explain why.
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
Sector | Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions | Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | Year of target implementation | Base year | Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Percentage reduction target | Target year | Target year absolute emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Percentage of target achieved so far |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All emissions sources included in the city inventory |
N/A | Same – covers entire city and nothing else |
2010 |
2002 |
6000000 |
50 |
2030 |
3000000 |
10 |
Residential buildings |
All residential buildings in the city | Same – covers entire city and nothing else |
2012 |
2010 |
180000 |
60 |
2030 |
72000 |
8 |
Does this target align with the global 1.5-2°C pathway set out in the Paris Agreement? |
Please indicate to which sector(s) the target applies |
Does this target align to a requirement from a higher level of sub-national government? |
Please describe your target. If your country has an NDC and your city’s target is less ambitious than the NDC, please explain why. |
---|---|---|---|
Yes - 2°C | Energy industry Heating and cooling supply Commercial buildings Residential buildings Public facility Industrial facilities Transport |
No |
In 2002, we set a target to reduce GHG emissions by 40% in 2030. This target applies to all the emission sources covered by our inventory: buildings, in-boundary transport and waste. |
Yes - 2°C | Energy industry Heating and cooling supply Residential buildings |
No |
As part of city-wide climate action plan, we have a |
If “Fixed level target” selected in 5.0:
Please complete the following table.You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Sector | Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions | Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | Year of target implementation | Target year | Projected population in target year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field | Select from:
|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field |
Target year absolute emissions goal (metric tonnes CO2e) | Percentage of target achieved | Does this target align with the global 1.5 - 2°c pathway set out in the Paris Agreement? | Please indicate to which sector(s) the target applies | Does this target align to a requirement from a higher level of government? | Please describe your target. If your country has an NDC and your city’s target is less ambitious than the NDC, please explain why. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Select from:
| Select from:
| Select from:
| Text field |
[Add Row]
Please ensure to report long (2051+), medium (2026-2050) and short term (present-2025) targets if you have them.
Provide the details of your city’s fixed level emissions reduction target in the table provided under the following headings:
Sector
Please select ‘Total city-wide emissions’ to report the emissions reduction target for your total city-wide emissions inventory. If you have sector breakdowns of your city-wide emissions reduction target, please add a row and select the relevant sector.
Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions
Please use this field to explain any additional inclusions or exclusions in the target sectors in comparison with the inventory sectors.
Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1)
Indicate the boundary of your emissions reduction target relative to your city’s boundary (as reported in 0.1) by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
Year of target implementation
Please enter in numerical format the year in which your target came into effect or was approved by the local government. This differs from your base year which is used as a reference year from which to measure or compare emissions.
Target year
Please indicate to which sector(s) the target applies
Please refer to the guidance of question 5.0 (emissions reduction target) to understand the requirements of the GCoM Common Reporting Framework.
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
Sector | Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions | Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | Year of target implementation | Target year | Projected population in target year | Target year absolute emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Percentage of target achieved so far |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All emissions sources included in the city inventory |
N/A | Same – covers entire city and nothing else |
2011 |
2050 |
Numerical field |
0 | 10 |
Does this target align with the global 1.5-2°C pathway set out in the Paris Agreement? | Please indicate to which sector(s) the target applies | Does this target align to a requirement from a higher level of sub-national government? | Please describe your target. If your country has an NDC and your city’s target is less ambitious than the NDC, please explain why. |
---|---|---|---|
Yes - 2°C | Energy industry Heating and cooling supply Commercial buildings Residential buildings Public facility Industrial facilities Transport |
Yes |
This is a fixed level target decided by the national government in 2011 |
If “Base year intensity target” selected in 5.0:
Please complete the following table. The table is displayed over several rows for readability. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Sector | Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions | Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | Base year | Year of target implementation | Intensity unit (Emissions per) | Base year emissions per intensity unit (metric tonnes CO2e per denominator) | Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field | Select from:
|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Select from:
|
Numerical field | Numerical field |
Percentage reduction target in emissions intensity | Target year | Target year absolute emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Percentage of target achieved | Does this target align with the global 1.5 - 2°c pathway set out in the Paris Agreement? | Please indicate to which sector(s) the target applies | Does this target align to a requirement from a higher level of government? | Please describe your target. If your country has an NDC and your city’s target is less ambitious than the NDC, please explain why. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Select from:
| Select from:
| Select from:
| Text field |
[Add Row]
Please ensure to report long (2051+), medium (2026-2050) and short term (present-2025) targets if you have them.
Provide the details of your city’s base year emissions (absolute) target in the table provided under the following headings:
Sector
Please select total emissions in order to report the emissions reduction target for your total city-wide emissions inventory. If you have sector breakdowns of your city-wide emissions reduction target, please add a row and select the relevant sector.
Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions
Please use this field to explain any additional inclusions or exclusions in the target sectors in comparison with the inventory sectors.
Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1)
Indicate the boundary of your emissions reduction target relative to your city’s boundary (as reported in 0.1) by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
Base year
Please enter the appropriate year to the numerical field provided. Your base year in which your base year (also known as “representative year”) is the reference year from which your greenhouse gas reductions are measured. Please ensure the base year corresponds to the total emissions inventory if Total is selected in the sector field. If you are reporting a target for a specific sector of your local government inventory, please provide the base year for that sector.
Year of target implementation
Please enter in numerical format the year in which your target was established or came into effect. This differs from your base year which is used as a reference year from which to measure or compare emissions.
Intensity unit (Emissions per)
Please define the variable used in your city’s intensity target by selecting the relevant variable from the drop down options (either metric tonnes CO2e per capita, or metric tonnes CO2e per GDP). If your city uses a variable which is not listed, please select “Other” and define the variable in the box provided. Emissions intensity refers to emissions per unit of another variable, which is typically economic output, such as GDP, but may also be population, energy use, or a different variable.
Base year emissions per intensity unit (metric tonnes CO2e)
Please enter the numerical value of your base year emissions, without commas. Your base year emissions are the greenhouse gas emissions from your base year on which your target is based. Please ensure the base year emissions corresponds to the total emissions inventory if Total is selected in the sector field. If you are reporting a target for a specific sector of your city-wide emissions inventory, please provide the base year emissions for that sector. Please ensure that the base year emissions correspond with the base year reported.
Base year absolute emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)
Please enter the numerical value of your base year absolute emissions, without commas. Your base year emissions are the greenhouse gas emissions from your base year on which your target is based. Please ensure the base year emissions corresponds to the total emissions inventory if Total is selected in the sector field. If you are reporting a target for a specific sector of your city-wide emissions inventory, please provide the base year emissions for that sector. Please ensure that the base year emissions correspond with the base year reported.
Percentage reduction target in emissions intensity
Please enter the numerical value of your percentage reduction target, without commas and without the percentage symbol (%). If your target is not currently expressed as a percentage, please convert it into this format (for example an emissions reduction in metric tonnes CO2e per intensity metric can be converted into a percentage reduction relative to the base year). If this is not possible, please note your target reduction and other relevant detail in the Comment field for this question.
Target year
Please enter in numerical form the year by which you anticipate achieving your goal. Please note that the target year cannot be in the past.
Target year absolute emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)
Please indicate the absolute emissions expected in the target year when the target is achieved. For example, if a 20% reduction on 2000000 tC02e is the goal for 2030, then in 2030 the expected absolute emissions would be 1600000 tC02e.
Percentage of target achieved so far
Please enter a numerical value for the percentage of your emissions reduction target that you have achieved since the ‘Target year start’, without commas and without the percentage symbol (%).State the target’s percentage completion (in terms of emissions) against the base year emissions. For example, if your target is to reduce your emissions by 10% by 2020 compared with a 2010 base year, and in your reporting year your emissions had reduced by 3% compared to that target base year, your target is 30% complete ((3/10) x 100). If you have met your target in the reporting year, indicate 100% complete. It is not possible to put values greater than 100% in this field; however if you have exceeded your target, explain in the Comment field.
If you set an absolute target to stabilize your greenhouse gas emissions against a base year, enter 0 (zero) until the target year. For example, if a city sets an absolute target to cap emissions using a 2008 base year and a 2019 target year. For reporting years until 2019, they would enter 0 (zero) in this column, before entering 100% in 2019 if they have achieved their target.
Does this target align with the global 1.5-2°C pathway set out in the Paris Agreement?
The Paris agreement set out a pathway to keep global temperature increase to well below 2 degrees. Many cities are developing targets in line with the Paris agreement goals, such as New York City's 80% by 2050 reduction target. If your city's target is aligned with the Paris agreement goals, please select the relevant option from the list.
Please indicate to which sector(s) the target applies
Please use this field to select all sectors that are covered under the target
Does this target align to a requirement from a higher level of sub-national government?
Please select the relevant option from the list to indicate whether the target aligns with a requirement set by county, state or regional government.
Please describe your target. If your country has an NDC and your city’s target is less ambitious than the NDC, please explain why
Describe your target in this field and where your city's target is less ambitious than your country's NDC, please explain why.
Please refer to the guidance of question 5.0 (emissions reduction target) to understand the requirements of the GCoM Common Reporting Framework.
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
Sector |
Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions | Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | Base year | Year of target implementation | Intensity unit (Emissions per) | Base year emissions per intensity unit (metric tonnes CO2e per denominator) | Base year absolute emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All emissions sources included in city inventory |
This target excludes the south coastal region due to different governance structures involving private business in the region | Smaller – covers only part of the city |
2002 |
2012 | Metric tonnes of CO2e per capita |
3.0 |
800000 |
Energy |
This target includes all industrial buildings within the city boundary | Same – covers entire city and nothing else |
2010 |
2010 | Metric tonnes of CO2e per capita |
1.4 |
13000 |
Percentage reduction target in emissions intensity |
Target year | Target year absolute emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Percentage of target achieved | Does this target align with the global 1.5-2°C pathway set out in the Paris agreement? | Please indicate to which sector(s) the target applies | Does this target correspond to a requirement from a higher level of government? | Please describe your target. If your country has an NDC and your city’s target is less ambitious than the NDC, please explain why. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 |
2050 |
Numerical field |
8
|
No | Energy industry Heating and cooling supply Commercial buildings Residential buildings Public facility Industrial facilities Transport |
No |
The target set for the city-wide emissions is a 10% reduction on per capita emissions from 2002 by 2050. This excludes the geographical boundary of the port area. |
30 |
2030 |
Numerical field |
4
|
No | Commercial buildings Industrial facilities |
No |
If “Baseline scenario (business as usual) target” is selected in response to 5.0:
Please complete the following table.The table is displayed over several rows for readability. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Sector | Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions | Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | Base year | Year of target implementation | Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Target year | Estimated business as usual absolute emissions in target year (metric tonnes CO2e) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field | Select from:
|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field |
Percentage reduction target from business as usual | Percentage of target achieved | Does this target align with the global 1.5 - 2°c pathway set out in the Paris Agreement? | Please describe the target and the modelling methodology(ies) and parameters used to define it | Please indicate to which sector(s) the target applies | Does this target align to a requirement from a higher level of government? | Please describe your target. If your country has an NDC and your city’s target is less ambitious than the NDC, please explain why. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Select from:
| Text field | Select from:
| Select from:
| Text field |
[Add Row]
Please ensure to report long (2051+), medium (2026-2050) and short term (present-2025) targets if you have them.
Provide the details of your city’s base year emissions (absolute) target in the table provided under the following headings:
Sector
Please select total emissions in order to report the emissions reduction target for your total city-wide emissions inventory. If you have sector breakdowns of your city-wide emissions reduction target, please add a row and select the relevant sector.
Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions
Please use this field to explain any additional inclusions or exclusions in the target sectors in comparison with the inventory sectors.
Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1)
Indicate the boundary of your emissions reduction target relative to your city’s boundary (as reported in 0.1) by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
Base year
Please enter the appropriate year to the numerical field provided. Your base year (also known as a “representative year”) is the reference year from which your greenhouse gas reductions are measured. Please ensure the base year corresponds to the total emissions inventory if Total is selected in the sector field. If you are reporting a target for a specific sector of your local government inventory, please provide the baseline year for that sector.
Year of target implementation
Please enter in numerical format the year in which your target was established or came into effect. This differs from your base year which is used as a reference year from which to measure or compare emissions.
Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)
Please enter the numerical value of your base emissions, without commas. Your base emissions are the greenhouse gas emissions from your base year on which your target is based. Please ensure the base year emissions corresponds to the total emissions inventory if Total is selected in the sector field. If you are reporting a target for a specific sector of your city-wide emissions inventory, please provide the base year emissions for that sector. Please ensure that the base year emissions correspond with the base year reported.
Target year
Please enter in numerical form the year by which you anticipate achieving your goal. Please note that the target year cannot be in the past.
Estimated business as usual absolute emissions in target year (metric tonnes CO2e)
Please indicate the estimated business as usual emissions figure in the target year (defined in the previous field). A baseline scenario is a reference case that represents the events or conditions most likely to occur in the absence of activities taken to meet a mitigation target.
Percentage reduction target from business as usual
Please enter the percentage reduction relative to your city’s baseline scenario emissions (reported in ‘base year emissions’). This should not include commas or the percentage symbol (%).State the target’s percentage completion (in terms of emissions) against the base year emissions. For example, if your target is to reduce your emissions by 10% by 2020 compared with a 2010 base year, and in your reporting year your emissions had reduced by 3% compared to that target base year, your target is 30% complete ((3/10) x 100). If you have met your target in the reporting year, indicate 100% complete. It is not possible to put values greater than 100% in this field; however if you have exceeded your target, explain in the Comment field.
If you set an absolute target to stabilize your greenhouse gas emissions against a base year, enter 0 (zero) until the target year. For example, if a city sets an absolute target to cap emissions using a 2008 base year and a 2019 target year. For reporting years until 2019, they would enter 0 (zero) in this column, before entering 100% in 2019 if they have achieved their target.
Percentage of target achieved so far
Please enter a numerical value for the percentage of your emissions reduction target that you have achieved since the ‘Target year start’, without commas and without the percentage symbol (%).
Does this target align with the global 1.5-2°C pathway set out in the Paris Agreement?
The Paris agreement set out a pathway to keep global temperature increase to well below 2 degrees. Many cities are developing targets in line with the Paris agreement goals, such as New York City's 80% by 2050 reduction target. If your city's target is aligned with the Paris agreement goals, please select the relevant option from the list.
Please describe the target and the modelling methodology(ies) and parameters used to define it
Please describe the modelling methodologies used to develop your business as usual trajectory in order to better understand the variables and assumptions involved in the business as usual pathway.
Please indicate to which sector(s) the target applies
Please use this field to select all sectors that are covered under the target
Does this target align to a requirement from a higher level of sub-national government?
Please select the relevant option from the list to indicate whether the target aligns with a requirement set by county, state or regional government.
Please describe your target. If your country has an NDC and your city’s target is less ambitious than the NDC, please explain why
Describe your target in this field and where your city's target is less ambitious than your country's NDC, please explain why.
Please refer to the guidance of question 5.0 (emissions reduction target) to understand the requirements of the GCoM Common Reporting Framework.
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
Sector | Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions | Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | Base year | Year of target implementation | Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Target year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total city-wide emissions |
This target covers all scope 1 and scope 2 emissions within the city boundary | Same – covers entire city and nothing else |
2005 |
2015 |
740000000 |
2025 |
Transportation |
This target covers all transport within the city boundary | Same – covers entire city and nothing else |
2002 |
2012 |
48000000 |
2030 |
Estimated business as usual absolute emissions in target year (metric tonnes CO2e) | Percentage reduction target from business as usual | Percentage of target achieved | Does this target align with the global 1.5-2°C pathway set out in the Paris agreement? | Please describe the target and the modelling methodology(ies) and parameters used to define it | Please indicate to which sector(s) the target applies | Does this target correspond to a requirement from a higher level of government? | Please describe your target. If your country has an NDC and your city’s target is less ambitious than the NDC, please explain why. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
700000000 |
20 |
63 |
Yes - 2°C | The target uses projection scenarios defined by the U.S. EIA Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) 2011 | Energy industry Heating and cooling supply Commercial buildings Residential buildings Public facility Industrial facilities Transport Water | Yes and it exceeds its scale or requirements |
Projecting from 2005, our business-as-usual (BAU) emissions are expected to reach 79 million tonnes CO2e in 2025. The city’s target is to limit emissions to 12% of the BAU scenario. The target exceeds the level of ambition of the 5% by 2030 target for the national level set out in the NDC. |
38000000 |
10 |
30 |
Do not know | Transport | Yes and it exceeds its scale or requirements |
If "No target" is selected in 5.0:
Please complete the following table:
Reason | Comment |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
Please give more details on why you do not have a city-wide or local government emissions target by selecting a suitable option from the drop down options in the “Reason” field; providing a comment on this selection in the “Comments” field.
If Yes – 1.5 or Yes – 2°c is selected in “Does this target align…” in 5.0a, 5.0b, 5.0c or 5.0d:
This is an open text question.
Please note that when copying from another document into the disclosure platform, formatting is not retained.
Please use this field to describe the methodologies used to develop your city's emissions reduction target, and indicate any methodologies used to ensure the target is aligned with the Paris agreement goals of keeping global temperature increase to well below 2 degrees.
If any selection except No target in 5.0:
Select one of the following options:
Please refer to the guidance of question 5.0 (emissions reduction target) to understand the requirements of the GCoM Common Reporting Framework.
If Yes to 5.2:
This is an open text question.
Please note that when copying from another document into the disclosure platform, formatting is not retained.
Please refer to the guidance of question 5.0 (emissions reduction target) to understand the requirements of the GCoM Common Reporting Framework.
If any selection except No target in 5.0:
Select one of the following options:
Please refer to the guidance of question 5.0 (emissions reduction target) to understand the requirements of the GCoM Common Reporting Framework.
If Yes to 5.3:
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Type of transferable emissions | Emissions saved (metric tonnes CO2e) | What percentage of the target does this unit represent? | Please identify which target this refers to and describe the transferable emissions unit in particular the source of the transferable units |
---|---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Text field |
A carbon offset is a reduction in emissions of carbon dioxide or greenhouse gases made in order to compensate for or to offset an emission made elsewhere.
If offset credits are generated in the geographic boundary and sold, these should be documented separately from emissions reporting. In addition, any offsets purchased from outside the geographic boundary should be separately reported and not “netted” or deducted from the reported inventory results.
Please refer to the guidance of question 5.0 (emissions reduction target) to understand the requirements of the GCoM Common Reporting Framework.
Please complete the following table.You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Mitigation action | Action title | Means of implementation | Implementation status | Estimated emissions reduction (metric tonnes CO2e) | Energy savings (MWh) | Renewable energy production (MWh) | Timescale of reduction / savings / energy production |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Select from Appendix D | Text field | Select all the apply from Appendix F | Select from:
|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Select from:
|
Co-benefit area | Action description | Finance status | Total cost of the project | Total cost provided by the local government | Primary fund source | Web link to action website |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Select all that apply from Appendix H | Text field | Select from:
| Numerical field | Numerical field | Select from:
| Text field |
[Add Row]
These columns are additional to question 5.4 for ICLEI GCC cities
Name of the stakeholder group | Role in the GCC program | Name of the engagement activities | Aim of the engagement activities | Attach reference document |
---|---|---|---|---|
Text field | Text field | Text field | Text field | Text field and attachment function |
Please find below a breakdown of the information cities and local governments are asked to compile and report on as part of the GCoM new common reporting framework.
Provision level | Information required | To be included in the plan or assessment? | Relevant field in the Cities questionnaire |
---|---|---|---|
Mandatory | Brief description of the mitigation action | Yes | “status of action” and “Action description and implementation progress” fields |
Mandatory | Assessment of energy saving, renewable energy production, and GHG emissions reduction by action | Yes | “Estimated emissions reduction (metric tonnes CO2e)”, “Energy savings (MWh)”, “renewable energy production (MWh)” fields |
Recommended | Implementation status | Yes | “Implementation status” and “Action description” fields |
Recommended | Cost of the action | Yes | "Total cost of project” field |
Recommended | Timeframe of the action | Yes | “Action description” field |
Recommended | Financial strategy for implementing the action | Yes | “Primary fund source” and “Action description” fields |
Recommended | Implementing agencies | Yes | “Action description” field |
Recommended | Stakeholders involved in planning and implementation | Yes | “Action description” field |
Mandatory | Monitoring report | No – to be reported directly through the questionnaire every two years after submitting the action plan(s). The monitoring reports shall provide information about the implementation status of each action contained in the action plan, helping to monitor progress made | Update all fields in question 5.4 |
This question requests information about the efforts you are undertaking to reduce community-wide emissions.
For example, a city may have multiple projects within the wider activity of improving buildings energy efficiency / retrofit measures, which may involve different forms of public/private partnership, different sectors, scope, costs or timescale. This question seeks to understand the details about emissions reduction projects which your city has, including the activities which they fall under, emissions reduction potential, timescale and other details.
Mitigation action
Individual actions fall within a broader group of activity. The list of activities is provided in Appendix E of the questionnaire. Please select the relevant actions that apply to your city from the drop down menu.
Action title
Use this text box to provide the name (if applicable) of the adaptation action or project your city is undertaking.
Means of implementation
Please select from the list to indicate how your city is planning to implement the specified action.
Implementation status
Please indicate the current status of the project by selecting from the following options:
Estimated emissions reduction (metric tonnes CO2e)
Please enter the numerical value of the total cumulative anticipated emissions reductions as a result of the action in metric tonnes CO2e without commas and without unit symbols. This can be an estimate. If you prefer to report this information in amount of energy saved, please use the next field.
Energy savings (MWh)
Please enter the numerical value of the total cumulative anticipated energy savings in megawatt hours as a result of the action without commas and without unit symbols. This can be an estimate. If you prefer to report this information in amount of renewable energy produce, please use the next field.
Renewable energy production (MWh)
Please enter the numerical value of the total cumulative anticipated renewable energy generated in megawatt hours as a result of the action without commas and without unit symbols. This can be an estimate.
Timescale of reduction/savings/energy production
Select from the drop down menu the timescale for the estimated emissions reduction / energy savings / renewable production reported in the previous field. If the figure represents an annual reduction or production select “Per year”, or select “Projected lifetime” if it represents total emissions saved over the lifetime of the project. If the figure represents neither annual reduction or total lifetime emissions / energy saved, select ‘Other' and provide an explanation.
Co-benefit area
Actions taken to adapt to climate change can also provide additional areas of benefit for the city. Please select which areas other than reducing vulnerability are also improved as a result of the action.
Action description
The ORS provides a free text box for you to enter further information about your greenhouse gas reduction efforts. Text can be entered freely into this field but please keep this as concise as possible. Description of actions should include further details about: scope, costs, timescale and collaborators.
Finance status
Please select the relevant option to indicate what financing has been secured for this action. If the action has not secured full financing, please report the project in the opportunities section under question 6.2.
Total cost of the project
Please provide the total expected cost of the project, in numbers with no delimiters. For example $600,000 should be written as 600000. Please ensure you are reporting using the currency selected in 0.4.
Total cost provided by the local government
Please provide the total cost provided by the local government, if any, in numbers with no delimiters. For example $600,000 should be written as 600000. Please ensure you are reporting using the currency selected in 0.4.
Primary fund source
Please select the relevant fund source providing the majority of funding for the project.
Web link to project
Provide a web link to the project website
Select one of the following options:
Local governments shall develop plans for both climate change mitigation and adaptation (climate resilience), which may be presented in separate plans or an integrated plan. Local governments shall submit their climate action plans to GCoM within three years upon joining GCoM.
Please note that local governments may develop joint action plans with their neighbouring communities.
Please indicate whether your city has a climate change action plan by selecting “Yes”; “In progress”; “Intending to undertake in the next 2 years”; “Not intending to undertake”; or “Don’t know” from the drop down menu provided.
Further to incorporating sustainability goals into the city’s master plan, this question explores whether your city has created a separate action plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This could for example include a plan for the local public transportation to cut GHG emissions by modernizing the bus fleet to hybrid vehicles. A climate action plan should include information about baseline emissions, target reductions, sectors of focus, stakeholder engagement, implementation and monitoring plans.
If you wish to see an example of a climate change action plan please refer to London’s which can be found here.
If Yes to 5.5:
Please complete the following table.You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Publication title and attach document | Year of adoption from local government | Web link | Areas covered by action plan | Boundary of plan relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | If the city boundary is different from the plan boundary, please explain why and any areas/other cities excluded or included |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Text field and attachment function |
Numerical field |
Text field |
Select all that apply from Appendix E | Select from:
|
Text field |
Stage of implementation | Has your local government assessed the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits, if any, of the main mitigation and adaptation actions you identified? | Comment or describe the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits of this interaction | Has there been a stakeholder engagement plan to develop the plan? | Primary author of plan |
---|---|---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Text field | Text field | Select from:
|
[Add Row]
Please find below a breakdown of the information cities and local governments are asked to compile and report on as part of the GCoM new common reporting framework.
Provision level | Information required | To be included in the plan or assessment? | Relevant field in the Cities questionnaire |
---|---|---|---|
Mandatory | Local governments shall develop plans for both climate change mitigation and adaptation (climate resilience), which may be presented in separate plans or an integrated plan. Local governments shall submit their climate action plans to GCoM within three years upon joining GCoM. | N/A | Questions 5.5 and 5.5a |
Optional | Local governments may develop joint action plans with their neighbouring communities. | Yes | Detail the neighbouring communities included in the plan in the “If the city boundary is different from the plan boundary, please explain why and any areas/other cities excluded or included” field in question 5.5a |
Mandatory | Date of adoption of the plan | Yes | “Year of adoption from local government” field in question 5.5a |
Mandatory | All actions of priority sectors (identified from the GHG emissions inventory) | Yes | “Areas covered by action plan” field in table question 5.5a |
Mandatory | Name of the local government(s) which formally adopted the plan | Yes | “If the city boundary is different from the plan boundary, please explain why and any areas/other cities excluded or included” field in question 5.5a |
Mandatory | Synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits of mitigation and adaptation actions | Yes | "Comment or describe the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits of this interaction” field in question 5.5a |
Mandatory | Description of the stakeholder engagement processes | Yes | “Has there been a stakeholder engagement plan to develop the plan?” field in question 5.5a |
Mandatory | Lead author team | Yes | "Primary author of plan” field in table question 5.5a |
Mandatory | Mitigation target(s) (including sectoral targets if available) | Yes | Question 5.0 |
Mandatory | Descriptions for each mitigation action | Yes | Question 5.4 |
Mandatory | Assessment of energy saving, renewable energy production, and GHG emissions reduction by mitigation action | Yes | Question 5.4 |
Recommended | Metric (or key performance index) for tracking progress and monitoring plans | Yes | Question 5.4 |
Recommended | Prioritization of mitigation actions | Yes | N/A – to be included in the plan |
Recommended | Policy instruments to implement the mitigation actions | Yes | N/A – to be included in the plan |
Mandatory | Monitoring report | No – to be reported directly through the questionnaire every two years after submitting the action plan(s). The monitoring reports shall provide information about the implementation status of each action contained in the action plan, helping to monitor progress made.> |
Update all fields in question 5.4 |
Mandatory | The local government shall update and resubmit the action plan(s) when there are significant changes to the existing plan(s). | N/A | Update all fields in question 5.5a |
If you have a climate action plan, please provide additional details about it in this question. Please indicate:
Publication title and attach the document
State the official name of your city’s climate action plan. Click on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file you want to upload and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach & Save’ to attach the document.
Year of approval from local government
Enter the year the plan was published and approved by the city as a numeric value.
Web link
Provide a web link to the climate action plan
Areas covered by action plan
Please select all the relevant areas from the list that are included in your city's action plan.
Boundary of assessment relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1)
Indicate the boundary of your city’s adaptation plan relative to your city’s boundary (as reported in 0.1) by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
If the city boundary is different from the plan boundary, please explain why and any areas/other cities excluded or included
Please explain your choice in the previous field. For example, if your city’s risk assessment covers only part of the city, please use this field to describe which areas your plan covers and the reason behind this.
Stage of implementation
Indicate the extent to which your city has implemented its climate change action plan by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
Has your local government assessed the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits, if any, of the main mitigation and adaptation actions you identified?
Please select from the options to indicate whether your city has assessed the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits, of the main mitigation and adaptation actions identified in the plan. Click here to read more about how to identify potential interactions between climate adaptation and mitigation measures.
Comment or describe the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits of this interaction
Describe the interactions between adaptation and mitigation measures, and how these were assessed.
Has there been a stakeholder engagement plan to develop the plan?
Please describe the stakeholder engagement processes conducted during the development of the action plan, including stakeholders involved, how the relevant stakeholders were engaged and the results of the engagement.
Primary author of plan
Indicate the primary author responsible for the primary planning document to address climate adaptation in your jurisdiction by selecting the most applicable response from the following list of values:
If Not intending to undertake, or Intending to undertake in the next 2 years to 5.5:
Please complete the following table:
Reason | Comment |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
In the first field, select from the following options in the drop-down menu the most appropriate reason for why you do not have or do not intend to have a climate change action plan:
Please provide more information or context on the reason selected in the comment field. Such a description should include information about the practical barriers that impact each reason, or detail your progress in developing a plan and the areas likely to be incorporated within it.
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Opportunity | Describe how the city is maximizing this opportunity |
---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field |
[Add Row]
This question invites you to detail the economic opportunities from mitigating, and adapting to, climate change and asks you to describe how your city is seizing them. Please select the relevant options that apply to your city from the drop down menu in the table; selecting inappropriate options may negatively impact the accuracy of your CDP analytics.
For example, you may note that your city sees the potential growth of the local solar industry, adding tax revenue and job growth in your city.
Economic Opportunities
Describe how the city is maximizing this opportunity
For each of the economic opportunities identified in the previous field, please highlight what your city is doing to seize this opportunity in this field. For example, if you selected “development of new business industries” under Economic Opportunity, you might detail your city’s efforts to encourage and support the development of new business industries within the city limits or provide consulting services to other municipalities who are trying to attract new business industries.
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
Economic opportunity |
Describe how the city is maximizing this opportunity |
---|---|
Improved efficiency of operations |
Performing a local and regional emissions inventory had the added benefit of identifying inefficiencies in operations by tracking data related to energy consumption, waste processes and water consumption at the government operations and regional levels. |
Increased attention to other environmental concerns |
The city created a ‘congestion-zone’ in the downtown area where private cars are only allowed to drive during peak times if they pay a substantial fee. This has decreased the number of cars on the street 65% during peak times. This was done to reduce emissions and reduce traffic but it has also lessened the amount of smog in the city by 30% and resulted in more income for the city. |
Select one of the following options:
This question aims to understand how cities collaborate with businesses on sustainability issues. Some examples of collaboration can be found in the 2014 CDP Cities report, Protecting Our Capital.
Response
Please answer by selecting “Yes”; “In progress”; “Intending to undertake in the future”; “Not intending to undertake”; or “Don’t know” from the drop down menu provided.
If Yes to 6.1:
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Collaboration area | Description of collaboration |
---|---|
Select from Appendix E | Text field |
Collaboration area
Please select an appropriate collaboration area or sector from the drop-down list that your city is collaborating with business in. Table rows can be added or deleted as needed to report multiple collaboration areas.
Description of collaboration
If you selected “Yes” as your response, please use this text box to describe what areas or projects your city works on with businesses.
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Project area | Project Title | Stage of project development |
---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field |
Select from:
|
Status of financing | Project description | Total cost of project | Total investment cost needed (if relevant) |
---|---|---|---|
Select from:
| Text field | Numerical field | Numerical field |
The goal of this question is to understand what climate-change related projects your city is currently seeking external financing for from public or private institutions. These may be projects relating to renewable energy, sustainable transport, building or energy efficiency, waste, water or other climate-related areas. From the data gathered in this question, CDP aims to help cities improve access to financing for climate change-related projects.
Use the table in this question to list the different projects your city is looking to attract public or private sector finance for – you can add multiple projects by clicking ‘Add row’. If your city is not currently seeking financing on any relevant projects, please select “No relevant projects” in the first field.
Project area
Use the drop down options to select the project area that is closest to the project that your city is seeking financing for. If your city does not have any projects currently seeking financing, please select “None”.
Stage of project development
Please indicate the current status of the project by selecting from the following options:
Status of financing
Please indicate the status of the project’s financing by selecting from the following options:
Project description
Use this text box to describe the project in as much detail as possible. Detail should include context about the project such as: project name, a web link, the scale of the project, collaborators in the project, expected environmental and social impacts, the type of financing being sought (if known), etc.
Total cost of project
Give an estimate of the total overall cost of the project, including any financing which has already been secured.
Total investment cost needed (if relevant)
Indicate how much finance you hope to raise for the project. If your project is partially financed and seeking additional finance, please indicate the amount of money your city is still seeking.
Select one of the following options:
Select one of the following options:
Indicate whether your city has a dedicated fund for renewable energy or carbon reduction programs or services.
Please complete the following table:
Does your city have a credit rating? | Rating agency | Rating | |
---|---|---|---|
International | Select from:
| Text field | Text field |
Domestic | Select from:
| Text field | Text field |
International and domestic credit ratings and rating agencies are offered by third-party rating agencies such as Standard & Poor or Moody's. Municipal market participants rely heavily on these indicators of risk when they determine the relative value of municipal investments.
Select one of the following options:
This is an open text question.
Please note that when copying from another document into the disclosure platform, formatting is not retained.
Please complete the following table:
Does the individual have responsibility for oversight and/or implementation of investment of the city retirement funds? | |
---|---|
City council/elected representatives | Select from:
|
Treasury or city finance staff | Select from:
|
Other staff | Select from:
|
Select one of the following options:
This question seeks to understand whether your city has a strategy in place to achieve economic growth and development through urban activities that reduce negative environmental externalities and the impact on natural resources and environmental services.
Numerical field.
This question considers green growth strategies, including those meant to accelerate investment and job creation in the sustainability sector, encourage the growth of green enterprise districts or clusters, and quantify the economic benefit of climate action. If you do not know, please provide an estimate.
The questions in this section refer to emissions associated with your local government operations (sometimes referred to as “corporate” or “municipal”) emissions.
The module gives you the opportunity to disclose your local government’s emissions inventory as well as some other metrics that will provide a holistic picture of your operations. Calculating an LGO inventory is a good first step into measuring emissions, as the data is more readily available than a city-wide inventory, hence many cities chose to calculate LGO emissions before developing a community inventory.
This section of the questionnaire is divided into 4 pages:
CDP recognizes that cities use different methodologies to measure their greenhouse gas emissions. As such, at this time CDP does not require cities to use a specific methodology to report to CDP - you may disclose an emissions inventory that has been calculated by any methodology. Please identify the methodology used at the appropriate place in the questionnaire.
CDP also recognizes that many cities have created their own proprietary methodologies for calculating greenhouse gas emissions. If your city fits into this category, please provide as much information as possible about the methods you have used to measure your emissions.
Please note that a metric tonne is equivalent to 2,204.6lbs. The “long ton”, a term generally used in Britain, is equivalent to 2,240lbs and the “short ton”, generally used in the USA, is equivalent to 2,000lbs. The CDP Cities questionnaire asks for CO2e measurements in metric tonnes.
For more information on any of the above considerations, please refer directly to the protocols listed in this section of the guidance document or contact [email protected].
The questions in this section refer to emissions reduction targets and actions associated with your local government operations (sometimes referred to as "corporate" or "municipal") emissions.
By selecting Yes below, you are indicating that you have fuel and/or greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data from your local government operations (sometimes referred to as ‘corporate’ or ‘municipal’ emissions) to report at this time.
Select one of the following options:
The municipal or local government inventory is a subset within the city-wide inventory. City-wide emissions are designed to represent the total quantity of GHG emissions produced by your community (as defined by geographic boundaries) and will therefore include Government emissions which are emissions rising from the local authority’s own estate and operations. You will have the opportunity to describe the methodology or protocol utilized to measure your city’s emissions later in the questionnaire.
For more information on the difference between Government and Community emissions inventories, please see the following documents:
Local Government Operations Protocol (LGOP) for the Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (Version 1.1) (a collaboration between The California Air Resources Board, The California Climate Action Registry, The Climate Registry, and ICLEI) International Local Government GHG Emissions Analysis Protocol (IEAP) developed by ICLEI Appendix B in the Global Protocol for Community-scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (WRI, C40 and ICLEI).
If Yes or In progress to 7.0:
Please complete the following table:
From | To |
---|---|
Drop-down calendar | Drop-down calendar |
The ORS provides a drop-down calendar for you to enter the dates requested. Entries MUST be for a 12-month period. If you do not have data for the entire 12-month period, please extrapolate to 12 months please extrapolate to 12 months (by multiplying figures [12/x amount of months in inventory] * emissions figures).
If Yes or In progress to 7.0:
Select one of the following options:
A drop-down list is provided with the following values:
The options allow for emissions to be captured from a ranging set of institutions, from government departments to quasi-governmental authorities, public corporations and special purpose vehicles. Further guidance on the suitability of these different methods is available in the Local Government Operations Protocol, the WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol, and Appendix B of the Global Protocol for Community Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories.
If none of the listed options describes your boundary, please select “other” from the drop down list. You will then be provided with a text box in which to describe your boundary.
If Yes or In progress to 7.0:
Please complete the following table:
Primary protocol | Comment |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
CDP recognizes that cities use different methodologies to measure their greenhouse gas emissions. As such, at this time CDP does not require cities to use a specific methodology to report local government emissions to CDP - you may disclose an emissions inventory that has been calculated by any methodology.
In the first field you will see a list of methodologies. Please select the methodology on which you base the majority of your calculations. The system will only let you select one methodology. If you do not see your chosen methodology reflected in the list please select “Other” and describe your methodology
You might have calculated your emissions using multiple methodologies or by slightly modifying an existing methodology. In the comment field, please detail how you have used multiple methodologies or how your city collects and manages data for your local government operations.
If Yes or In progress to 7.0:
Select all that apply:
The list consists of the main greenhouse gases defined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), as well as nitrogen triflouride (NF3).
If Yes to 7.0:
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Source | Fuel | Amount | Units | Emissions (tonnes CO2e) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Select from:
| Select from Appendix C | Numerical field | Select from:
| Numerical field |
[Add row]
The intent of the question is to capture data on fuel that is consumed (converted to end-use energy) directly by your city – referring to Scope 1. Scope 1 emissions are all direct GHG emissions sources owned or operated by the municipal government. This fuel could be used in combustion in owned or controlled boilers, furnaces, vehicles, etc.
The ORS provides a table for your answer with the following fields:
Source
Please select a source of your fuel consumption, the list of emissions sources is the same as in LGO1.2.
Fuel
The second field is a list of fuel types in a drop-down menu. The list of fuels is drawn from WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol Stationary Combustion Guidance document. The fuels are listed in alphabetical order. The most commonly used fuels are provided in the box below.
Under the additional headings of the table – ‘Amount’ and ‘Units’ – please provide the corresponding data for the fuel type used. The energy units should be selected from the following: GWh; MWh; kWh; TJ; GJ; MJ; Therms; Btu; m3; L; Metric tonnes; Short tons. Multiple entries can be made, using the ‘Add Row’ facility at the bottom right of the table.
Emissions
Please provide the total emissions resulting from burning the fuels identified in the Fuel column. Please provide the number in metric tonnes CO2e with no delimiters.
If Yes to 7.0:
Scope 1: All direct GHG emissions
Scope 2: Indirect GHG emissions associated with the consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, steam, heating, or cooling.
Please complete the following table:
Total Scope 1 + Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Total Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Total Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Text field |
This question is your opportunity to enter a numeric value for the total figure of your local government’s GHG emissions in the selected year, as well as your total scope 1 and scope 2 emissions if your city disaggregates these emissions. Please note that these are local government operation emissions only and should be provided in metric tonnes CO2e.
Scope 1 emissions are all direct GHG emissions sources owned or operated by the municipal government. Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions as a result of electricity, steam, heating, or cooling that has been purchased or acquired by the municipal government. For more information on scopes see the Local Government Operations Protocol.
If your city has only calculated Scope 1 emissions, provide this in the ‘Total Scope 1’ field, and leave both ‘Total Scope 1 + Scope 2’ and ‘Total Scope 2’ emissions fields blank.
If your city disaggregates emissions into Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, please enter the totals for your accounting year here. Refer to your city’s emissions methodology or protocol to determine if this categorization is relevant for your city. Scopes are a common categorization and more details are available in the following methodologies:
A table is provided with the following fields:
Total Scope 1 + Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)
Enter the sum of your total Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions in metric tonnes CO2e as a numeric value.
Total Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)
Enter your total scope one emissions in metric tonnes CO2e as a numeric value. Scope 1 refers to all direct GHG emissions from the municipal local government operations.
Total Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)
Enter your total scope one emissions in metric tonnes CO2e as a numeric value.Scope 2 refers to all indirect GHG emissions associated with the consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, steam, heating, or cooling of the municipal local government operations.
Comment
Provide more detail on your scope 1 and 2 emissions reported. Please check that your Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions add up to your total emissions. Please use the comment field to explain any inconsistencies or gaps in data.
If Yes to 7.0:
Select one of the following options:
Please answer by selecting “Yes”; “In progress”; “Intending to undertake in the next 2 years”; “Not intending to undertake”; or “Don’t know” from the drop down menu provided.
As an example, the following description of Scope 3 emissions is taken directly from the ICLEI Local Government Operations Protocol:
Further detail on measuring Scope 3 emissions can be found in the ICLEI Local Government Operations Protocol.
If Yes to 7.7:
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Source of Scope 3 emissions | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | Comment |
---|---|---|
Select from:
| Numerical field | Text field |
[Add Row]
This is a table question with three fields to allow explanation of the Scope 3 emissions sources which are included in the local government operations inventory. The fields provided are as follows:
Source of Scope 3 emissions
Provide a breakdown of the different categories of scope 3 emissions by choosing a source from the list of values:
You can find more information on scope 3 upstream and downstream activities here.
Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)
Provide the amount of CO2e emitted for each source.
Comment
Provide more detail about your Scope 3 emissions reported.
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
Source of Scope 3 emissions |
Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) |
Comment |
---|---|---|
Employee commuting |
4000 |
Estimate based on a survey conducted amongst city employees regarding their ways of traveling to work |
If Not intending to undertake or Intending to undertake in the next 2 years to 7.7:
Please complete the following table:
Reasoning | Explanation |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
If you do not measure Scope 3 emissions, please explain why not.
Reasoning
In this field, select from the following options in the drop-down menu the most appropriate reason for why you do not measure scope 3 emissions in your local government operations :
Explanation
Please provide more information or context on the reason selected in the previous field.
If Yes to 7.0:
Please complete the following table:
Change in emissions | Reason for change | Please explain |
---|---|---|
Select from:
| If “Increased” or “Decreased” selected:
| Text field |
The purpose of this table is to understand the change in emissions over time and the factors which led to that change.
Change in emissions
In the first field, please select how your emissions have changed compared to the emissions you reported last time. A drop down with the following list of values is provided:
Reason for change
In the second field, please select from the drop down menu to indicate the reason you have identified that led to this change.
For example, if you previously reported emissions from 2012 and you are now reporting emissions from 2014 please explain any material difference in the figures. For instance, you may have experienced population increase, which may have affected the figures.
Please explain and quantify changes in emissions
Please provide more information or context on the reasons for change that you have selected. Please include the percentage or absolute amount of emissions that have changed since your last inventory. If the change in emissions is due to several factors, please select the reason for the most significant change and use this column to explain any other factors.
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
Change in emissions |
Reason for change |
Please explain |
---|---|---|
Decreased |
Policy change |
Last year we reported emissions from our last inventory calculated in 2012. This year we have updated our inventory and notice a decrease in our total emissions. We believe this change is the result of the policies which we have implemented aimed at reducing emissions, including installing LED street lighting, and improving municipal transport infrastructure. |
If Yes to 7.0
Select one of the following options:
City governments (or any large organization) may see value in having external verification or auditing of their emissions and emission reduction efforts. This can ensure higher levels of quality control / quality assurance. The ability to call on verified data may provide your government with a powerful tool in efforts to influence policy or regulation at other levels of government or with other community stakeholders.
Please respond to indicate whether your local government emissions have been externally verified or audited by selecting “Yes”, “In progress”, “Intending to undertake in future”, “Not intending to undertake” or “Do not know” from the drop down menu.
If Yes to 7.9:
Please complete the following table:
Name of verifier and attach verification certificate | Year of verification | Please explain which parts of your inventory are verified |
---|---|---|
Text field and attachment function | Numerical field | Text field |
This is a table question with fields to provide an opportunity to describe relevant information about this verification process with the following headings:
Name of verifier and attach verification certificate
List the names of organizations which have verified your greenhouse gas emissions and provide proof of verification in the form of an attachment. This function allows you to attach your verification certificate document. To attach a document click on ‘Choose file’, navigate to the file you want to upload and click ‘Open’. Once you can see the file name in the text field click ‘Attach & Save’ to attach the document.
Year of verification
State the year in which the verification occurred.
Please explain which parts of your inventory are not verified
If the inventory is only verified for certain sectors or scopes, please identify here which parts of the inventory are not covered by the verification. You can also use this field to provide additional details on your verification process, such as:
If Not intending to undertake, or Intending to undertake in the next 2 years to 7.9:
Please complete the following table:
Reason | Comments |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
Please give more details on whether and how you plan to verify your emissions related to your local government operations in the future by selecting an option from the drop down options in the “Reason” field; providing a comment on this selection in the “Comments” field.
Select one of the following options:
Renewable energy targets are defined as numerical goals established by governments to achieve specific amount of renewable energy production or consumption. They can apply to the electricity, heating/cooling or transport sectors, or to the energy sector as a whole. To respond to this question please select the dropdown that is most appropriate to your city:
If Yes to 8.0:
Please complete the following table. The table is displayed over several rows for readability. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Scale |
Energy / electricity types covered by target | Base year | Total renewable energy / electricity covered by target in base year (in unit specified in column 2) |
Percentage renewable energy / electricity of total energy or electricity in base year |
---|---|---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Numerical field |
Numerical field |
Percentage field |
Target year | Total renewable energy / electricity covered by target in target year (in unit specified in column 2) | Percentage renewable energy / electricity of total energy or electricity in target year | Percentage of target achieved | Plans to meet target (include details on types of energy/electricity) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Percentage field | Percentage field | Text field |
[Add Row]
The goal of this question is to understand the targets you have in place regarding renewable electricity or energy in your city. This year, we have combined both renewable energy and electricity targets into one table, to allow comparability between different target types. You may report either capacity based (MW) or output based (MWh) renewable energy targets. For more information on setting renewable energy targets, please refer to the IRENA Renewable Energy Target Setting report, which defines renewable energy targets as:
“Numerical goals established by governments or other actors (such as electric utilities) to achieve a specific amount of renewable energy production or consumption. Renewable energy targets can apply to the electricity, heating/cooling or transport sectors, or to the energy sector, and include a specific time period or date by which the target is to be reached.”
Please provide your response in the table provided under the following headings:
Scale
Please select which scale your target applies to. This can either be for your local government operations only or for your community.
Energy types covered by target
Please select the energy type covered by your city’s renewable energy or electricity target. Please note the selection you make in this field will define the units used for the entire row of the table. For example, if you select “Total installed capacity of renewable energy (in MW)”, the number provided in for ‘base year renewable energy’ as well as ‘target year renewable energy’ will both be in MW. Please select from the following options:
Base year
Please enter the appropriate year to the numerical field provided. Your base year (also known as the “representative year”) is the reference year from which your energy or electricity is measured. If you are reporting a target for a specific sector of your city or local government, please provide the base year for that sector.
Total renewable energy covered by target (in unit specified in ‘Energy / electricity types covered’ field)
Please enter the numerical value of the total renewable energy covered by the target in the base year field.
Percentage renewable energy / electricity of total energy or electricity in base year
Please enter the proportion of total electricity from renewable energy in the base year. For example, your city may have 7% of the total electricity from renewable sources in the base year.
Target year
Please enter in numerical form the year by which you anticipate achieving your goal. Please note that the target year cannot be in the past.
Total renewable energy / electricity covered by target (in unit specified in ‘Energy / electricity types covered’ field)
Please indicate the total amount of renewable energy / electricity covered by the target in the units specified in the target year.
Percentage renewable energy / electricity of total energy or electricity in target year
Please indicate the proportion of total electricity as a percentage from renewable energy sources in the target year.
Percentage of target achieved so far
Please enter a numerical value for the percentage of your renewable energy or electricity target that you have achieved since the ‘Target year start’, without commas and without the percentage symbol (%).
Plans to meet target (include details on types of energy)
Please be as specific as possible when describing how you are planning to reach your renewable electricity target and do not hesitate to mention or reference any plans or strategies developed to help deliver the target.
For explanatory purposs, a sample answer to this question is included below.
Scale | Energy / electricity types covered by target | Base year | Total renewable energy / electricity covered by target in base year (in unit specified in column 2) | Percentage renewable energy / electricity of total energy or electricity in base year |
---|---|---|---|---|
City-wide |
Total installed capacity of renewable energy (in MW) |
2000 |
25 |
20 |
Target year | Total renewable energy / electricity covered by target in target year (in unit specified in column 2) | Percentage renewable energy / electricity of total energy or electricity in target year | Percentage of target achieved | Plans to meet target (include details on types of energy / electricity) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2025 |
100 |
80 |
20 |
By 2025, the goal is to have 80% of the city’s electricity from renewable sources. |
If Not intending to undertake, or Intending to undertake to 8.0:
Please complete the following table:
Reasoning | Comment |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
Please give more details on why you do not have a renewable energy or renewable electricity target by selecting a suitable option from the drop down options in the “Reason” field; providing a comment on this selection in the “Comments” field. Such a comment should include information about the barriers that impact each reason, or detail your progress in developing a target and the areas likely to be incorporated within it.
Select one of the following options:
If Yes to 8.1:
Please complete the following table:
Energy source | Percent |
---|---|
Coal | Percentage field |
Gas | Percentage field |
Oil | Percentage field |
Nuclear | Percentage field |
Hydro | Percentage field |
Biomass | Percentage field |
Wind | Percentage field |
Geothermal | Percentage field |
Solar | Percentage field |
Other sources | Percentage field |
The goal of this question is to get a better understanding of the current energy mix of your electricity grid and the contribution made by renewable technologies at the city-wide scale.
In the first field we have listed the most common sources of energy. Please indicate in the second field the percentage of each energy source constituting your energy mix, where it is applicable. Please ensure that the total percentage entered adds up to 100. If the energy source is not applicable to your electric grid please enter 0.
Please note: If you do not have data for city-wide energy mix, only for national or local government level, describe this in the comments.
The energy mix of countries can be found here.
For explanatory purposes, a sample answer to this question is included below.
Energy source | Percent |
---|---|
Coal |
20 |
Gas |
30 |
Oil |
7 |
Nuclear |
20 |
Hydro |
0 |
Biomass |
0 |
Wind |
12 |
Geothermal |
0 |
Solar |
10 |
Other sources |
1 |
If Yes to 8.1:
Select from:
Percentage field.
This question seeks to understand the city-wide electricity grid mix.
If Yes to 8.1:
Please complete the following table:
Type | MW capacity | Please describe the scale of the energy source |
---|---|---|
Renewable district heat/cooling | Numerical field | Text field |
Solar PV | Numerical field | Text field |
Solar thermal | Numerical field | Text field |
Ground or water source | Numerical field | Text field |
Wind | Numerical field | Text field |
Other: please specify | Numerical field | Text field |
The goal of this question is to get a better understanding of the installation of renewable energy across key areas, and the contribution of these installations at the city-wide scale in absolute figures. Renewable technologies use natural energy to make electricity.
In the first field we have listed the most common sources of energy. Please indicate in the second field the MW capacity of renewable energy installed within the city boundary. If the energy source is not applicable in your electricity grid, please enter 0.
Select from:
Investing in energy efficiency can help expand and improve urban services, while contributing to cities’ efforts to be more competitive and address climate change. Energy efficiency policies and investments can curb energy demand growth and emissions growth in the near term while fueling economic growth without compromising goals of greater access to reliable and affordable energy services. Please select from the list of options to indicate whether your city has set a target to improve energy efficiency within the city.
If Yes to 8.6:
Please complete the following table. The table is displayed over several rows for readability. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Scale | Energy efficiency type covered by target | Base year | Total energy consumed/produced covered by target in base year (in unit specified in column 2) | Target year |
---|---|---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field |
Total energy consumed/produced covered by target in target year (in unit specified in column 2) | Percentage of energy efficiency improvement in target year compared to base year levels | Percentage of target achieved | Plans to meet target (include details on types of energy in thermal /electricity) | Please indicate to which energy sector(s) the target applies (Multiple choice) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Text field | Select from:
|
[Add Row]
If Not intending to undertake, or Intending to undertake to 8.6:
Please complete the following table:
Reasoning | Comment |
---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field |
Please complete the following table:
Total tonnes of CO2e emissions per capita | |
---|---|
Commercial | Numerical field |
Municipal | Numerical field |
Residential | Numerical field |
New buildings | Numerical field |
All building types | Numerical field |
Please complete the following table:
Emissions reduction target | Energy efficiency target | |
---|---|---|
Commercial | Select from:
| Select from:
|
Municipal | Select from:
| Select from:
|
Residential | Select from:
| Select from:
|
New buildings | Select from:
| Select from:
|
All building types | Select from:
| Select from:
|
Indicate whether your city has established targets in reductions in either greenhouse gas emissions or energy use.
Please complete the following table:
Response | Please provide more detail and/or link to more information about the requirements |
---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field |
Select one of the following options:
Please complete the following table:
Total final energy use (kWh) | |
---|---|
Commerical |
Numerical field |
Institutional |
Numerical field |
Municipal |
Numerical field |
Residential |
Numerical field |
New Buildings |
Numerical field |
All building types |
Numerical field |
The total final energy use is sometimes referred to as final or delivered energy, and refers to the total energy used in the buildings.
Select all that apply:
If ‘Passenger transport’ is selected in 10.0:
Please complete the following table:
Mode share | |
---|---|
Private motorized transport | Percentage field |
Rail/Metro/Tram | Percentage field |
Buses (including BRT) | Percentage field |
Ferries/ River boats | Percentage field |
Walking | Percentage field |
Cycling | Percentage field |
Taxis or For Hire Vehicles | Percentage field |
Other | Percentage field |
Indicate what proportion of journeys in your city are taken by each mode of transport. For each mode, please indicate what percentage of total trips are taken by this mode. Ideally this information should come from a single source.
For each mode, please indicate what percentage of kilometers by mode. The transport department or transit operators are likely to house this data
If ‘Freight transport’ is selected in 10.0:
Please complete the following table:
Mode share | |
---|---|
Private motorized transport | Percentage |
Rail/Metro/Tram | Percentage |
Ferries/River boats | Percentage |
Other | Percentage |
Please complete the following table:
Number of journeys made each year | |
---|---|
Private motorized transport | Numerical field |
Rail/Metro/Tram | Numerical field |
Buses (including BRT) | Numerical field |
Ferries/ River boats | Numerical field |
Walking | Numerical field |
Cycling | Numerical field |
Taxis or For Hire Vehicles | Numerical field |
Other | Numerical field |
Assign numeric response.
This question aims to understand how many kilometres are travelled by road goods vehicles in your city annually. Please provide a breakdown by light goods vehicles and heavy goods vehicles.
Please complete the following table:
Number of private cars | Number of buses | Number of municipal fleet (excluding buses) | Number of freight vehicles | Number of taxis | Transport Network Companies (e.g. Uber, Lyft) fleet size | Customer-drive carshares (e.g. Car2Go, Drivenow) fleet size | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total fleet size | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field |
Electric | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field |
Hybrid | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field |
Plug in hybrid | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field |
Hydrogen | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field |
A private vehicle is a road motor vehicle, other than a moped or a motor cycle, intended for the carriage of passengers and designed to seat no more than nine persons (including the driver).
Municipal fleet can include sedans, special use vehicles like police cars and vans etc.
A freight vehicle is a road vehicle designed, exclusively or primarily, to carry goods. Included are:
Please complete the following table:
Number of buses | |
---|---|
Total number of buses | Numerical field |
Electric | Numerical field |
Hybrid | Numerical field |
Plug-in hybrid | Numerical field |
Hydrogen | Numerical field |
Diesel | Numerical field |
CNG | Numerical field |
Indicate the number of buses procured in the last year and the break down by technology.
Select one of the following options:
Here is an example of a low emission zone https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/low-emission-zone
London are also introducing an Ultra Low Emission Zone https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/ultra-low-emission-zone
If Yes is to 10.7:
Please complete the following table:
Size (sq. km) | Stipulations and any plans to expand |
---|---|
Numerical field | Text field |
Please complete the following table:
Response | Size and stipulations in terms of access restriction by weight, by engine type, by height, etc. | Please provide more detail about the Restricted zone |
---|---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field | Text field |
Please complete the following table:
EV charging point type | Number of charging points |
---|---|
Rapid 43 kw and above | Numerical field |
Fast 7-22kw | Numerical field |
Slow 3kw or below | Numerical field |
All types | Numerical field |
Select one of the following options:
If Yes to 10.11:
Numerical field
If Yes to 10.11:
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Number of days exceeding your city’s Air Quality Index standards | Unit |
---|---|
Numerical field | Select from:
|
If Yes to 10.11:
Please complete the following table:
Min daily average concentration | Max daily average concentration | Annual average concentration | Units | % completeness of data (e.g. % of days with monitoring) | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Particulate matter PM2.5* | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Text field | Text field | Text field |
Particulate matter PM10* | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Text field | Text field | Text field |
Carbon monoxide (CO)* | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Text field | Text field | Text field |
Nitrogen dioxides (NO2x) * | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Text field | Text field | Text field |
Sulphur dioxides (SO2x) * | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Text field | Text field | Text field |
Ozone (O3) | Numerical field | Numerical field | Numerical field | Text field | Text field | Text field |
This is an open text question.
Please note that when copying from another document into the disclosure platform, formatting is not retained.
Numerical field.
Please provide the size of total park area in your city, which can include community gardens and cemeteries, in square kilometres.
Percentage field.
For this question, please only consider public transport stops that have frequent service at rush hour. The transit mode can be of any type (heavy rail, light rail, BRT, bus, cable-propelled transit, ferry, etc.). Using demographic data and a GIS layer of public transport stops, please estimate the percentage of the city’s population that lives within 500 meters of transit stops that receive frequent service at rush hour.
Numerical field.
Food public procurement relates to both the purchasing of (raw) food and the contracting out of catering services fully or in parts by public authorities. It applies to different settings and venues such as hospitals, care homes, armed forces, prisons, and canteens in governmental buildings and of course education settings including universities and public schools. Please provide the number of meals served per year by municipal public bodies or by catering services fully or in part contracted out by your city.
Numerical field.
This is the amount of human or animal edible products grown or directly sourced within your city. This doesn’t include foods produced externally but packaged within the city. This refers to anything produced within the geographical boundary of your city. Please report in metric tonnes. Examples of such growing may be on urban farms, green roofs, allotments, domestic window boxes.
Numerical field
Please complete the following table:
Response | Please describe the expected outcome of the policy |
---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field |
Please complete the following table:
Response | Please provide more detail about the incentives/tax/bans |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
Please complete the following table:
Amount | |
---|---|
Total solid waste generation (kg/year) | Numerical field |
Waste generation per capita (kg/person/year) | Numerical field |
Numerical field
Numerical field
Please complete the following table:
Amount of total solid waste collected (tonnes/year) | |
---|---|
Total |
Numerical field |
Residential |
Numerical field |
Commercial |
Numerical field |
Industrial | Numerical field |
Construction and demolition waste | Numerical field |
Other | Numerical field |
Please complete the following table:
Waste treatment | Tonnes/year |
---|---|
Re-use | Numerical field |
Recycling | Numerical field |
Composting | Numerical field |
Anaerobic digestion | Numerical field |
Incineration or other form of thermal treatment | Numerical field |
Open burning | Numerical field |
Sanitary landfill | Numerical field |
Non-sanitary landfill | Numerical field |
Other | Numerical field |
Please attach the relevant document here.
Please complete the following table:
Response | Please provide more detail about the restriction policies or regulations |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
Select all that apply:
Please select the most relevant options for sources of your city’s water supply
Select one of the following options:
Percentage field.
The proportion of the city’s resident population that has clean drinkable water available, at least 20 litres of safe water per day per person, either directly within their home, or within access across a very short distance, no further than 200 meters from the home.
Select one of the following options:
This question asks you to consider risks to the city’s water supply. These risks may or may not be caused or exacerbated by climate change. Consider risks that stem from physical impacts as well as those that may result from regulatory, economic or social settings.
If Yes to 14.3:
Please complete the following table.You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Risks | Timescale | Magnitude | Risk description |
---|---|---|---|
Select from:
| Select from:
| Select from:
| Text field |
[Add Row]
This question is structured as a table. Multiple rows can be entered into the table using the ‘Add Row’ button to the bottom right of the table.
Risks to water supply
This question asks you to identify the risk to your water supply. The field provides a drop down list of options from which to select. The values are:
Timescale
The table offers four choices for timescale:
Magnitude
This question asks cities to assess the seriousness of the risks to their water supply. The categories of risk are general and the levels of seriousness are broad so cities should make choices based on their own assumptions or assessments. Three options are available to describe the level of risk:
Risk description
The final field of the table gives you an opportunity to comment on the risks you have identified.
If No to 14.3:
Please complete the following table:
Reason | Explanation |
---|---|
Select from:
| Text field |
This question gives you the opportunity to explain why your city does not face future risks to its water supply and your process for evaluating current or future risks.
Please give more details on why your city does not face future risks to its water supply and your process for evaluating current or future risks by selecting a suitable option from the drop down options in the “Reason” field; providing a comment on this selection in the “Comments” field.
If Yes to 14.3:
Please complete the following table.You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Risks | Adaptation action | Status of action | Action description and implementation progress |
---|---|---|---|
Populated from 14.3a |
Select from:
|
Select from:
|
Text field |
[Add Row]
Select one of the following options:
If Yes to 14.5:
Please complete the following table. You are able to add rows by using the “Add Row” button at the bottom of the table.
Publication title and attach document | Year of adoption from local government | Web link | Does this strategy include Sanitation services? | Stage of implementation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Text field and attachment function | Numerical field | Text field | Select from:
|
Select from:
|
[Add Row]
If No to 14.5:
Please complete the following table:
Reason | Explanation |
---|---|
Select from:
|
Text field |
CDP has been making information requests relating to carbon and climate change on behalf of investors since 2003. To find out more about CDP and the previous responses from other organizations, please refer to our website at www.cdp.net.
What are the financial implications of responding?
CDP has charitable status and seeks to use its limited funds effectively. Consequently, responses must be prepared and submitted at the expense of responding cities. CDP also reserves the right, where it deems it appropriate in view of its charitable aims and objectives, to charge for access to or use of data and/or reports it publishes or commissions.
What is the basis of participation and what will happen to the data received?
When responding to CDP you will be given a choice as to whether your response is made public or non-public. We strongly encourage cities to make their responses public which means that the response will be made publicly available from the CDP website. Non-public responses will not be made publicly available and will only be used in aggregate and/or anonymously. Any responses submitted to the Global Covenant of Mayors (GCoM) will be considered public.
Scoring of responses
CDP provides private scores to cities who respond to the CDP Cities 2019 information request, the scoring methodology can be found here. Responses to CDP Cities 2019 will not be scored publicly by CDP or its partners. CDP is considering publicly scoring responses in the future.
What if a city wishes to change or update a response?
After you submit your response via the Online Response System, it will become ‘read-only’ and any amendments can be made through the dashboard. Please submit and make all necessary amendments by the submission deadline.
How can a city confirm its participation?
If you received this document in hard copy, please email [email protected] to confirm your participation.
What is the legal status of CDP?
CDP Worldwide (CDP) is an international non-profit that drives companies and governments to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, safeguard water resources and protect forests. It is a UK registered charity (no. 1122330) and a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales (no. 05013650) with its registered office at 4th Floor Plantation Place South, 60 Great Tower Street, London EC3R 5AD. The charity has a wholly owned UK operating subsidiary and wholly owned subsidiaries in Germany, China and Hong Kong. It also exercises control over companies in Brazil, India and Japan through majority Board representation. In the US, CDP North America, Inc. is an independently incorporated entity which has US 501(c)(3) tax exempt status.
CDP is an independent not-for-profit organization holding the largest database of primary corporate climate change information in the world.
Thousands of organizations from across the world’s major economies measure and disclose their greenhouse gas emissions and climate change strategies through CDP. CDP puts this information at the heart of financial and policy decision-making and its goal is to collect and distribute high quality information that motivates investors, corporations and governments to take action to prevent dangerous climate change.
AED United Arab Emirates dirham
AFN Afghani
ALL Lek
AMD Armenian Dram
ANG Netherlands Antillian Guilder
AOA Kwanza
ARS Argentine Peso
AUD Australian Dollar
AWG Aruban Guilder
AZN Azerbaijanian Manat
BAM Convertible Marks
BBD Barbados Dollar
BDT Bangladeshi Taka
BGN Bulgarian Lev
BHD Bahraini Dinar
BIF Burundian Franc
BMD Bermudian Dollar (customarily known as Bermuda Dollar)
BND Brunei Dollar
BOB Boliviano
BOV Bolivian Mvdol (Funds code)
BRL Brazilian Real
BSD Bahamian Dollar
BTN Ngultrum
BWP Pula
BYR Belarussian Ruble
BZD Belize Dollar
CAD Canadian Dollar
CDF Franc Congolais
CHE WIR Euro (complementary currency)
CHF Swiss Franc
CHW WIR Franc (complementary currency)
CLF Unidades de formento (Funds code)
CLP Chilean Peso
CNY Yuan Renminbi
COP Colombian Peso
COU Unidad de Valor Real
CRC Costa Rican Colon
CUP Cuban Peso
CVE Cape Verde Escudo
CYP Cyprus Pound
CZK Czech Koruna
DJF Djibouti Franc
DKK Danish Krone
DOP Dominican Peso
DZD Algerian Dinar
EEK Kroon
EGP Egyptian Pound
ERN Nakfa
ETB Ethiopian Birr
EUR Euro
FJD Fiji Dollar
FKP Falkland Islands Pound
GBP Pound Sterling
GEL Lari
GHS Cedi
GIP Gibraltar pound
GMD Dalasi
GNF Guinea Franc
GTQ Quetzal
GYD Guyana Dollar
HKD Hong Kong Dollar
HNL Lempira
HRK Croatian Kuna
HTG Haiti Gourde
HUF Forint
IDR Rupiah
ILS New Israeli Shekel
INR Indian Rupee
IQD Iraqi Dinar
IRR Iranian Rial
ISK Iceland Krona
JMD Jamaican Dollar
JOD Jordanian Dinar
JPY Japanese yen
KES Kenyan Shilling
KGS Som
KHR Riel
KMF Comoro Franc
KPW North Korean Won
KRW South Korean Won
KWD Kuwaiti Dinar
KYD Cayman Islands Dollar
KZT Tenge
LAK Kip
LBP Lebanese Pound
LKR Sri Lanka Rupee
LRD Liberian Dollar
LSL Loti
LTL Lithuanian Litas
LVL Latvian Lats
LYD Libyan Dinar
MAD Moroccan Dirham
MDL Moldovan Leu
MGA Malagasy Ariary
MKD Denar
MMK Kyat
MNT Tugrik
MOP Pataca
MRO Ouguiya
MTL Maltese Lira
MUR Mauritius Rupee
MVR Rufiyaa
MWK Kwacha
MXN Mexican Peso
MXV Mexican Unidad de Inversion (UDI) (Funds code)
MYR Malaysian Ringgit
MZN Metical
NAD Namibian Dollar
NGN Naira
NIO Cordoba Oro
NOK Norwegian Krone
NPR Nepalese Rupee
NZD New Zealand Dollar
OMR Rial Omani
PAB Balboa
PEN Nuevo Sol
PGK Kina
PHP Philippine Peso
PKR Pakistan Rupee
PLN Zloty
PYG Guarani
QAR Qatari Rial
RON Romanian New Leu
RSD Serbian Dinar
RUB Russian Ruble
RWF Rwanda Franc
SAR Saudi Riyal
SBD Solomon Islands Dollar
SCR Seychelles Rupee
SDG Sudanese Pound
SEK Swedish Krona
SGD Singapore Dollar
SHP Saint Helena Pound
SKK Slovak Koruna
SLL Leone
SOS Somali Shilling
SRD Surinam Dollar
STD Dobra
SYP Syrian Pound
SZL Lilangeni
THB Baht
TJS Somoni
TMM Manat
TND Tunisian Dinar
TOP Pa'anga
TRY New Turkish Lira
TTD Trinidad and Tobago Dollar
TWD New Taiwan Dollar
TZS Tanzanian Shilling
UAH Hryvnia
UGX Uganda Shilling
USD US Dollar
UYU Peso Uruguayo
UZS Uzbekistan Som
VEB Venezuelan bolívar
VND Vietnamese đồng
VUV Vatu
WST Samoan Tala
XAF CFA Franc BEAC
XAG Silver (one Troy ounce)
XAU Gold (one Troy ounce)
XBA European Composite Unit (EURCO) (Bonds market unit)
XBB European Monetary Unit (E.M.U.-6) (Bonds market unit)
No action currently taken
Flood mapping
Heat mapping and thermal imaging
Landslide risk mapping
Sea level rise modelling
Biodiversity monitoring
Real time risk monitoring
Crisis management including warning and evacuation systems
Public preparedness (including practice exercises/drills)
Community engagement/education
Projects and policies targeted at those most vulnerable
Testing/vaccination programmes for vector-borne disease
Disease prevention measures
Air quality initiatives
Incorporating climate change into long-term planning documents
Restrict development in at risk areas
Resilience and resistance measures for buildings
Hazard resistant infrastructure design and construction
Diversifying power/energy supply
Economic diversification measures
Flood defences – development and operation & storage
Storm water capture systems
Additional reservoirs and wells for water storage
Soil retention strategies
Tree planting and/or creation of green space
Green roofs/walls
White roofs
Shading in public spaces, markets
Cooling systems for critical infrastructure
Retrofit of existing buildings
Cooling centers, pools, water parks/plazas
Cool pavement
Water extraction protection
Promoting low flow technologies
Water butts/rainwater capture
Xeriscapes – low water landscaping design
Maintenance/repair – leaking infrastructure
Optimizing delivery fuel mix of water supply
Improve water supply distribution method
Promoting and incentivizing water efficiency
Water use restrictions and standards
Water efficient equipment and appliances
Water smart metering
Water use audits
Awareness campaign/education to reduce water use
Diversification of water supply
Increasing use of desalination
Nature based solutions for water
Other<
Natural gas
Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)
Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Methane
Butane
Propane
Town gas or city gas
Coal (Bituminous or Black coal)
Coking coal
Crude oil
Diesel/Gas oil
Motor gasoline (petrol)
Aviation gasoline
Jet gasoline
Jet kerosene
Kerosene
Residual fuel oil
Distillate fuel oil No 1
Distillate fuel oil No 2
Distillate fuel oil No 3
Distillate fuel oil No 4
Distillate fuel oil No 5
Distillate fuel oil No 6
Liquified petroleum gas (LPG)
Naptha
Bitumen
Petroleum coke
Wood or wood waste
Biodiesel
Biogasoline
Ethanol
E85
Other liquid biofuel
Landfill gas
Other biogas
Waste (municipal)
Other
Buildings > Building codes and standards
Buildings > Building performance rating and reporting
Buildings > Carbon emissions reduction from industry
Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures
Buildings > On-site renewable energy generation
Buildings > Switching to low-carbon fuels
Community-Scale Development > Brownfield redevelopment programs
Community-Scale Development > Building standards
Community-Scale Development > Compact cities
Community-Scale Development > Eco-district development strategy
Community-Scale Development > Green space and/ or biodiversity preservation and expansion
Community-Scale Development > Low carbon industrial zones
Community-Scale Development > Transit oriented development
Community-Scale Development > Urban agriculture
Energy Supply > Low or zero carbon energy supply generation
Energy Supply > Optimize traditional power/ energy production
Energy Supply > Smart grid
Energy Supply > Transmission and distribution loss reduction
Finance and Economic Development > Developing the green economy
Finance and Economic Development > Instruments to fund low carbon projects
Finance and Economic Development > Low-carbon industrial zones
Food and Agriculture > Encourage sustainable food production and consumption
Mass Transit > Improve bus infrastructure, services, and operations
Mass Transit > Improve fuel economy and reduce CO2 from bus and/or light rail
Mass Transit > Improve fuel economy and reduce CO2 from ferries
Mass Transit > Improve fuel economy and reduce CO2 from trucks
Mass Transit > Improve rail, metro, and tram infrastructure, services and operations
Mass Transit > Smart public transport
Outdoor Lighting > LED / CFL / other luminaire technologies
Outdoor Lighting > Smart lighting
Private Transport > Awareness and education for non-motorized transport
Private Transport > Improve fuel economy and reduce CO2 from aviation
Private Transport > Improve fuel economy and reduce CO2 from motorized vehicles
Private Transport > Improve fuel economy and reduce CO2 from trucks (private)
Private Transport > Improve the efficiency of freight systems
Private Transport > Improve the operations of shipping ports
Private Transport > Infrastructure for non-motorized transport
Private Transport > Transportation demand management
Waste > Improve the efficiency of long-haul transport
Waste > Improve the efficiency of waste collection
Waste > Landfill management
Waste > Recyclables and organics separation from other waste
Waste > Recycling or composting collections and/or facilities
Waste > Waste prevention policies and programs
Water > Wastewater to energy initiatives
Water > Water metering and billing
Water > Water recycling and reclamation
Water > Water use efficiency projects
Energy
Transport (Mobility)
Building and Infrastructure
Industry
ICT (Information and Communication Technology)
Spatial Planning
Agriculture and Forestry
Fishery
Water
Waste
Public Health and Safety
Business and Financial Service
Social Services
Education
Capacity building and training activities
Awareness raising program or campaign
Stakeholder engagement
Infrastructure development
Assessment and evaluation activities
Monitor activities
Verification activities
Development and implementation of action plan
Policy and regulation
Financial mechanism
Sustainable public procurement
Extreme Precipitation > Rain storm
Extreme Precipitation > Monsoon
Extreme Precipitation > Heavy snow
Extreme Precipitation > Fog
Extreme Precipitation > Hail
Storm and wind > Severe wind
Storm and wind > Tornado
Storm and wind > Cyclone (Hurricane / Typhoon)
Storm and wind > Extra tropical storm
Storm and wind > Tropical storm
Storm and wind > Storm surge
Storm and wind > Lightning / thunderstorm
Extreme cold temperature > Extreme winter conditions
Extreme cold temperature > Cold wave
Extreme cold temperature > Extreme cold days
Extreme hot temperature > Heat wave
Water Scarcity > Drought
Wild fire > Forest fire
Wild fire > Land fire
Flood and sea level rise > Flash / surface flood
Flood and sea level rise > River flood
Flood and sea level rise > Coastal flood
Flood and sea level rise > Groundwater flood
Flood and sea level rise > Permanent inundation
Chemical change > Salt water intrusion
Chemical change > Ocean acidification
Chemical change > Atmospheric CO2 concentrations
Mass movement > Landslide
Mass movement > Avalanche
Mass movement > Rock fall
Mass movement > Subsidence
Biological hazards > Water-borne disease
Biological hazards > Vector-borne disease
Biological hazards > Air-borne disease
Biological hazards > Insect infestation
Disaster Risk Reduction
Enhanced resilience
Disaster preparedness
Enhanced climate change adaptation
Reduced GHG emissions
Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy)
Poverty reduction/eradication
Social inclusion, social justice
Social community and labour improvements
Greening the economy
Economic growth
Promote circular economy
Job creation
Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water)
Improved public health
Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy)
Security of tenure
Resource conservation (e.g. soil, water)
Ecosystem preservation and biodiversity improvement
Improved access to and quality of mobility services and infrastructure
Shift to more sustainable behaviours
Improved access to data for informed decision-making